quote:
The other eleven months celebrate "White History." You don''t think people forcibly displaced (not migrated) and disconnected from their ancestry don''t deserve a month to celebrate their (new) history, especially in the light of all the years of subjugation?
In all honesty, most "African-Americans" are barely African at all. Not only that, but the way "African History" is taught implies that there was one "African" culture. Not true!! There''s a whole continent full of people belonging to different groups and tribes, even with markedly different physical characteristics from one another, and then you mean to imply that there''s one culture? Far from it!! This is stereotyping in the extreme - in the name of political correctness.
Also, the argument that we spend the rest of the year studying "white history" bothers me. Is that why, in World History, we spent more time on China than on any other empire or culture? Is it why we spent a little time on the Renaissance, and that was our only Eurpoean history? Is that why, in US I, we spent months talking about slavery from the viewpoint of the slave, and skipped the military history of the Civil War to do that? No!! We study the cultures of all people all the time! I cannot stand how we have to draw lines between "black history" and "white history." Haven''t whites and blacks interacted substantially for the last two centuries?
quote:
Religion is religion. Culture is culture. Know the difference.
That is DEFINATELY not true. Religion and culture are very closely linked. They are less closely tied together in the United States, but, for most of history and in the rest of the world, they are very intertwined. The behavior of ultra-conservative Muslims (wearing veils, avoiding art and television, preventing females from going outside except out of utter necessity) is certaily both a cultural and religious phenomenon (even if it isn''t really following the teachings of Mohammed). The culture of Europe in the Middle Ages was similarly impacted heavily by Christianity. There is no dark line between religion and culture.
Another thing: Females do seem to be represented in games. The problem? Their clothing (or lack thereof). I don''t have a problem with having attractive leads (how many successful ugly actresses are there? And do you really want to spend time controlling an ugly person?); I DO have a problem with NakedChick fighting monsters with a sword. I dunno about you, but fighting in a bikini - let alone fighting without armor - seems kind of absurd to me!!
Which leads me to my final point: Use whatever character makes the most sense. If your story is about a knight who rescues a princess from a dragon in a castle, chances are that knight should be a western-European male in armor. Likewise, a samurai should be a Japanese male with a katana. If you''re doing a strategy game about the Hundred Years War, then chances are your hero should be a French female named Jean d''Arc! But aside from obvious examples like those, just use whatever you want, and whatever you think fits the story and the culture presented in it the best.