to me it looks like a file retreival system for a AI brain linked to memories.

But for me to use it you will need to but it into more readable code form.

Not over looking anything here.

You are genuinely attempting to program.

I do award you the Bronze award for epic trolling, though.

He's not trolling, I think he just had one of those moments where you feel like you're on the verge of discovering a new way to do something, but can't quite communicate exactly what it is you're thinking of.

In this case what he's talking about has actually been done before (Program that remembers situations, attempts to break them down, and apply them to questions).

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-02-25/google-s-computers-learn-to-play-video-games-by-themselves

BrianRhineheart,

Sorry about the mess,I'm not a programmer.

I use basic to verify that something works as I expect it to only.

Let me try and explain the coder in English .

step 1

A second number= (1/(first number*(1/second number)+1))*first number

Angle=atn(1/(first number*(1/second number)+1))

code=code+ ((1/first number)+(1/Angle))

step 2

for each first number in a list,repeat step 1

step 3

for each line repeat step 1 and step 2

step 4

relative code=code

end

Now

A relation set:

The sum of the inactive relation codes =Total of all relation codes +(sum of active relation codes *-1)

simply by adding in a relation code I can assign a logic path,to a logic card.

first relative code +

Thanks guys,

It is what it is.

I'd like to know if it turns up something useful.

I did bring the idea to attention for speculations,which is what I wanted to do.

I thought it might be something worth bringing attention to.

If it's been done,GREAT!!

That all I wanted to know.

That being said,I'd like more than one source of answer,for reliability.

He's not trolling, I think he just had one of those moments where you feel like you're on the verge of discovering a new way to do something, but can't quite communicate exactly what it is you're thinking of.

In this case what he's talking about has actually been done before (Program that remembers situations, attempts to break them down, and apply them to questions).

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-02-25/google-s-computers-learn-to-play-video-games-by-themselves

No, he's clearly trolling and just putting a few sentences here and there that somewhat make sense and it's funny how you guys managed to find meaning in them, correlate them with topics you can think of, and somehow decided he was thinking of Something while the troll probably didn't even have any clue what it would lead to.

He uses semi advanced English words yet he has no ability to make sentences that make any sense.

None of what he displays in pseudocode seems to relate even to the previous line

He is unable to express things at any abstract level yet pours hundreds of line of code to demonstrate it, yet those lines make no sense and he is unable to explain his "concept" in 1 or 2 lines.

All of that for a first time post on a gamedev site.

But no it couldn't be a troll. . .

No seriously, have you ever met someone who apparently knows English (has a big enough word dictionnary), can't make up simple sentences that make sense, and pours Something that makes as little sense as :

a as in ahh

Guest for the record,I'm not trolling for a thing.

And trying not to reek haveeeeek on this forum,I will not bring myself down to that level.

The truth is presented.Do with it,what you will.Or don't!

It's a difficult concept,maybe this will help.
Stream$="800 96 50 12"

(1/800)+(1/96)+(1/50)+(1/12)=0.115----(1/0.115)=8.6956521739130434782608695652174

((96*(1/800))+1)=1.12------------------------(1/1>12)=0.89285714285714285714285714285714

96*0.89285714285714285714285714285714=85.714285714285714285714285714286
Note(1/(1/800)+(1/96)))=85.714285714285714285714285714286

((50*(1/85.714285714285714285714285714286))+1)=1.5833333333333333333333333333333-----(1/1.5833333333333333333333333333333=0.63157894736842105263157894736842
50*0.63157894736842105263157894736842=31.578947368421052631578947368421
Note (1/((1/800)+(1/96)+(1/50))=31.578947368421052631578947368421

chart: {arctan}
D T % A T
96 800 .89285 41.760299703897870309452138780517 85.7142857
50 85.7142857 .63157 32.275644314577631864268075068688 31.578947
12 31.578947 .728970 36.09095011678286063580745413695 8.74764755


if the code is the sum of ((1/D)+(1/A)) then it is unique to the values as well as the orders.

if T is converted to F then the code is more unique,and there is an abstract inverse function{relation},thru A

c {capacitance} thru R is on both sides of the function.
L {inductance} thru old_A is on both sides of the function.
old_T thru F in on both sides of the function.

All that simply is proof of the uniqueness and relativity of the code.
Even if not absolutelly accurate,it is unique and relative to the input.


That said. if I use lines,I can say goto [15) {line 15}

Or I can say,if I think Stream$ { function coder(Stream$,code) then goto [val(code)]

now if I say Stream$(1) related to Stream(2) {code(1) relative to code(2) then goto [relation(code)].

Now it is abstract;,but,It is relative to the defined relation.
Just as .txt .DLL .exe

Only now like:
txtcode.txt
DLLcode.txt
execode.exe
filecode.txt
filecode.exe
infocode.txt
if the code is .04355 then all are related to the code source.
ie;
Filcode.exe
gallerycode.bmp
picturecode and GalleryTotal+(PictureLoss*-1)=Gaincode or "pictureGaincode"
.04355Fil
.04355gallery
.04455,.0034622picture

.04455 is "run Filcode.exe(gallerycode,picturecode,c46366)"

Think outside to box.
goto [pictureGaincode]
'
'
[pictureGaincode]
run "c:\Photos\House.bmp"
return

abaraba?