This discussion is getting very interesting. I've always found 4D objects to be really confusing, but doing searches for 'hypercube' and 'hypersphere' brought up these pages which really cleared things up for me:
http://www.geom.umn.edu/docs/outreach/4-cube/
http://www.cyburban.com/~mrf/hierarchy(1).html
Google is such a wonderful tool.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edcab/edcab57e7a5b203d76e000ff84b385e3c61be1c8" alt=""
That last site has some very relevant information for this thread. Basically what it says
(under the heading: "Myth #2: The hypersphere can't be visualized easily by those of us confined to three-dimensional thinking.") is that the surface of a 3D sphere can be represented by two 2D circles, one for each hemi-sphere. In 4D, the 'surface' volume of a hypersphere can be represented by two 3D spheres, one for each 'hemi-hypersphere'.
Still, this stuff makes my 3D brains hurt.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2baa/b2baaf0e96dd5d4d5661a557d738971291e1183d" alt=""
EDIT: typos
Edited by - Scarab0 on November 19, 2001 12:07:42 PM