Just a thought, but saying someone can't compete in multiple teams doesn't seem very useful. Most people won't want to or be able to, but in theory there might be an artist or something who could help multiple teams - especially as such people are rare than letting them be as useful as they want to be seems better.
I just want people to feel committed to their team, and if a person is on multiple teams one team might not get as much time with them as they planned/hopped for. Sure, someone might be able to handle multiple teams well, but I think it's best (in the general case) to allow a person to only be on one team.
I'm interested but not sure if I'll have the time. Not sure if I like the surprise topic thing, though.
From experience I always worry that it will be something like "poo war" and I'll lose all interest as soon as it is revealed.
Don't worry, it won't be anything like that!
Are you aware that the last two days actually overlap Ludum Dare #27? This might be a problem for some (I personally would love to participate in both events fully ;) )
I had no idea
I'd move the date, but most of the people said end-ish of August worked best for them. I don't want to do it after the 26th, and if I do it before the 23rd I'll have to start it during the 15th or so, which I don't think I can do because I'm in crunch mode at work getting ready for a game convention in Indiana that I'll be at next week showing our new product. If everyone is fine with starting end of August or early September we can move it, but otherwise I plan on keeping the dates as they are.