Advertisement

Deep philosophic stuff...

Started by March 09, 2009 08:12 AM
192 comments, last by Funkymunky 15 years, 7 months ago
Quote: Original post by polymorphed
What I've been asking is, does it really matter if you play by society's rules in order to gain this pleasure? Society might have self-regulated itself into a specific system which maximizes humanity's potential for survival, but does following this system reward us with the best possible pleasure/effort ratio for this one short lifetime we have to experience this existence?
You say that following this system increases the potential for pleasure in the future, because a human being which follows the system is somehow protected by it. That is probably true.

However, evolution does not care about pleasure/effort ratios, which is what we are interested in optimizing as much as possible, to get the most out of our short experience of existence. To evolution, whatever lives on, lives on, regardless of how much effort that lifeform experienced in order to live on.
We are now sufficiently advanced, at least in this thread, to look at our ourselves, our society and our existence, and wonder whether it should logically be worth the effort. I say, living by society's rules might not offer the best pleasure/effort ratio at all.


You might want to look into the concept of evolutionarily stable strategies, I think it sheds some light on the ideas you are looking at here.

Anyways though, here is how evolution and pleasure tie in. I think you are a least somewhat right in saying that humans are trying to optimize their pleasure, although it can be a little difficult to work with in any real sense because the pleasure you get from working hard to accomplish a goal and the pleasure you get from railing a pile of ecstasy are very different, so it is very difficult to compare the two in any meaningful way. But look at the things people naturally find pleasurable: you have the simple things like eating, sleeping, having sex, and also more complex things like raising children. Evolution design us so that the things we take pleasure in are also the things that help us survive and reproduce.


Quote: Original post by polymorphed
Are you sure? Let's make a simple equation, Pleasure = Intensity * Duration.
Your brain is probably capable of expressing a P value far greater than you'll ever experience just by ordinary life events. For the sake of simplicity let's say that every human's lifetime is exactly 100 years. During these 100 years, an average human would experience an I value of, say, 1. So, instead of experiencing a mundane P = 1 * 100, you could hook yourself up to your drug of choice intravenously along with essential nutrients for the maintenance of the human body, and experience a whopping P = 15 * 10. Going by the numbers alone, it's worth it. So, why not? You're just a meaningless collection of particles anyway.


That is a terrible example because it it not a feasible strategy. So lets instead look at two realistic strategies: the family man and the drug addict. Hell, I can even make up some numbers.

Average family man day (Life span 75 years):
Work (+1): 8 hours
Home time (+4): 8 hours
Sleep (+1): 8 hours
___________________
Life total: 1314000

Average drug addict day (Life span 50 years):
High (+10): 3 hours
Not High (-1): 13 hours
Sleep (+1): 8 hours
__________________
Life total: 456250


There is my model describing to you what should already be totally obvious.
--------------------------http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/icons/icon51.gif ... Hammer time
Quote: Original post by polymorphed
Of course, deja vu is just a bug in the software. [wink]
Yes, I've watched The Matrix. (No, I don't actually believe that deja vu is a bug in the software.)

No,software has appeared in universe later.Read something about bio-chemistry inside a living cell and you will see that your life and mind -secondary thing,deja vu in biological computer[smile]
Advertisement
Quote: Original post by Kwizatz
Well, first you have to prove a spiritual realm even exists, for all we know so called spiritual experiences are all linked to brain (mal)functions, this goes for the soul as well, there is no evidence there is such a thing as a soul, granted, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, but if there was such a thing as a soul, you'd expect certain things to be easily demonstrable and reproducible, IE: Astral Projection.

I'm able to Astral Project. I don't expect you to believe that I can Astral Project just because I say so, though. But if you try to teach yourself techniques for Astral Projection, then you might be able to prove to yourself that these things are indeed real.
In my own mind, there is no doubt that these things are true, because I'm also able to foretell the future.
For example, I can do this:

1. See a future event in one of my dreams.
2. Write that event down on a piece of paper.
3. Observe that event happening either the next day, or even months later.

This proves to me without a doubt that there is more to this universe than meaningless existence.

Quote: Original post by Kwizatz
how come there are none of these creatures which are "able to manipulate their surroundings purely by thought" around?

This is step three - planet Earth is a step three classroom. Step four students inhabit planets specifically dedicated to step four lessons.
If step four students were able to inhabit the Earth and levitate at will, wouldn't that completely destroy the entire atmosphere of the step three classroom which is about separation and amnesia?

Quote: Original post by Kwizatz
Quote: Original post by polymorphed
I'm sure I won't have to explain why a human life is more complicated than an animal one.


Ah! but you do, because you see, we are not any more complicated than an animal, in fact some organisms are much more complex than us genetically, for example the genome size of an amoeba is 670,000,000,000 base pairs, while the human genome is 3,200,000,000, now that's quite a difference, isn't it?

But never mind that for a moment, what really seems to differentiate us from the rest of the animals in matters of intelligence is our brain to body mass ratio, which simply put is the ratio between the brain mass and the whole body mass, we happen to be the ones with the largest ration in this planet, followed by dolphins, so it seems that all species are potential candidates to reach our level of intelligence or even surpass us.

But even if they did, I don't see how a higher BTBMR could give any organism telekinesis, the idea of telekinesis in the real world is just absurd to begin with, but lets think for a moment, the idea here is getting abilities beyond those of a human, well... cats have natural night vision, dogs can perceive a wider range of sound waves and bats move around using sonar, these are, according to you, "inferior" life forms right?

Instead of thinking about complexity as a function of the size of the genome, imagine that complexity is linked to that creature's ability to offer spiritual lessons. A human is able to understand more complex topics than an amoeba can, like the topic of, say, moral. A human can rationalize whether an action is moral or not, but an amoeba does nothing but follow its instincts.

Quote: Original post by Kwizatz
Well, again, there are some things we would expect to come about if things were like you say, in this case, you'd expect to remember past lives or at least life regression would be accurate, because, after all if we're here to go through school, we should keep the lessons learned wouldn't we?

You keep your lessons in the form of a modification to your essence or personality. Your day-to-day consciousness is like the tip of an iceberg sticking up from the sea. You can access the deeper levels of this iceberg with techniques such as past life regression.

Quote: Original post by Kwizatz
How convenient it is that we must reincarnate with a clean slate, of course I don't buy it

A clean slate allows for a fresh perspective on every lesson. Whenever you begin a new lesson at school, you like to open a fresh page to write notes down on, don't you?

Quote: Original post by Kwizatz
where are these step 4 creatures you talk about? sounds like we would be overpopulated by them.

Another planet/classroom.

Quote: Original post by Kwizatz
Also, how is that efficient? why does it have to be that way? there doesn't seem to be a definitive purpose for this whole charade you paint.

If you were intimately aware of the deeper connection to the universe, how could you ever choose the negative orientation?
This veil of forgetfulness and separation creates a very intensive experience which is very efficient at forcing entities quickly into an orientation.

Quote: Original post by Kwizatz
Quote: Original post by polymorphed
So, the fact of the matter is that just because you experience a remarkable isolation in your physical human body right now, that does not prove that the universe is not one single Creator.


It doesn't prove that it is either.

Your free will is free to decide. Separation or unity?

Quote: Original post by Kwizatz
Again, because we're overflowing the world with these beings right? I'll just keep hoping for probable abilities thank you (camouflage,night vision,super hearing, sonar, flight, breathing underwater, a glowing butt, ok, maybe not that last one [smile])

They're in another classroom. Does mixing 10th graders with 1th graders sound like a good idea to you?
Giving a 1th grader the ability to modify its surroundings purely by thought would be like handing a grenade to a monkey.

Quote: Original post by Kwizatz
Oh, right, because there is so much and vast evidence that UFO's and the paranormal are real and James Randi gave away his million dollars years ago... wait a minute.

This million dollar prize was never intended to be awarded to anyone. If someone gets close to winning it, they'll change the rules at the last minute to prevent it from being won. James Randi and his gang of comedians are a joke.

Quote: Original post by Kwizatz
At this point, I wont bother repeating myself, just where is the tangible evidence for this process?

There is no tangible evidence for it being true, but neither is there any tangible evidence for it being not true. This is the whole point of step three - amnesia and uncertainty. You're supposed to interact with your surroundings as a result of your personality, not reasoning.

Quote: Original post by Kwizatz
So, basically masturbation is the whole purpose of the universe.

If masturbation is an analogy to entertaining one's self with itself, then sure. The stroking process, whereby the actual entertainment is derived, is a bit more complex, though.

Quote: Original post by Kwizatz
Ummmm so you built a highly complex belief which ends up with the same practical application of "there is no purpose to the universe", Occam's razor all the way.

There is a purpose to the universe, which is that each entity should be allowed to find its own way back to the Creator using its own free will.
This free will allows an entity to choose how it advances spiritually.

Quote: Original post by Kwizatz
Of course!, I wouldn't expect otherwise.

I'm glad that we at least agree on something.

Quote: Original post by Kwizatz
You clarified a bit how your belief is constructed, you didn't provide any valid evidence for it's claims, so I am sorry, but to me this just seems to be another "finding the questions for the answers" belief system, like thinking human noses are so shaped to accommodate for glasses, it has no solid foundation whatsoever.

Talking about noses are made for glasses - this is exactly what the scientific community are doing to explain near death experiences. Instead of actually studying them, they try to come up with ideas for why they are impossible.
while (tired) DrinkCoffee();
Quote: Original post by MTT
That is a terrible example because it it not a feasible strategy. So lets instead look at two realistic strategies: the family man and the drug addict. Hell, I can even make up some numbers.

Average family man day (Life span 75 years):
Work (+1): 8 hours
Home time (+4): 8 hours
Sleep (+1): 8 hours
___________________
Life total: 1314000

Average drug addict day (Life span 50 years):
High (+10): 3 hours
Not High (-1): 13 hours
Sleep (+1): 8 hours
__________________
Life total: 456250


There is my model describing to you what should already be totally obvious.


Well, my point is that if you can find a configuration which offers you a P value which is way greater than what you'd expect to gain from living your life as evolution intended you to - then that should logically be how you ought to live your life, even if that way of living is by society's standards considered completely insane. Right?
while (tired) DrinkCoffee();
Quote: Original post by Krokhin
Quote: Original post by polymorphed
What I'm saying is that the Creator has always existed. I'm also saying that the Creator IS the universe - the Creator is not a separate entity which created the universe outside of itself. Rather, the Creator uses its infinite resources to mold itself into the universe that WE ARE. You are the Creator, Krokhin, how does it feel? [wink]

1.the Creator has always existed
2.Creator IS the universe
3.Creator is not a separate entity which created the universe outside of itself.
4.Creator uses its infinite resources to mold itself into the universe that WE ARE.
Ok,you are simply saying that creator==universe,and never mind is it "smart" universe/God or normal(i.e."stupid" and "blind").


Our point of disagreement is at whether the universe is actually a conscious entity. You say that the universe is something that just happened at random, I say that the universe decides how it should unfold.
while (tired) DrinkCoffee();
Quote: Original post by polymorphed
Our point of disagreement is at whether the universe is actually a conscious entity. You say that the universe is something that just happened at random, I say that the universe decides how it should unfold.

Hm...how it can decide something? You say that "whole" universe "smart",but how it can think-regarding light speed limitations,via "rat holes" in space or...?
In such case universe is simply a part of another "continuum"(11-dimentional,for example),but in such case may be a lot of "universes" .And now we just replace "continuum" to "multiverse"...
Advertisement
Quote: Original post by Krokhin
Hm...how it can decide something? You say that "whole" universe "smart",but how it can think-regarding light speed limitations,via "rat holes" in space or...?


Well, think about it. If the universe is one unified entity, then space/time isn't any hinderance is it? Time and space are to the Creator nothing but an illusion. Time and space are very real to us, though.
while (tired) DrinkCoffee();
Quote: Original post by polymorphed
Time and space are to the Creator nothing but an illusion.

Ok,you must prove me that it is Creator's illusion,not yours[smile]
Otherwise all this talks has no sense.I.e.you must explain what is "unified entity"( and throw away your Occam razor)
Quote: Original post by Krokhin
Quote: Original post by polymorphed
Time and space are to the Creator nothing but an illusion.

Ok,you must prove me that it is Creator's illusion,not yours[smile]
Otherwise all this talks has no sense.I.e.you must explain what is "unified entity"( and throw away your Occam razor)


If the Creator is just one entity, then that means that it is conscious of all parts of itself at all times. So, how is time or space going to produce any form of challenge to an entity that is everything that has been, is, and will be?
Think about that for a second. [smile]
while (tired) DrinkCoffee();
Quote: Original post by polymorphed
Well, my point is that if you can find a configuration which offers you a P value which is way greater than what you'd expect to gain from living your life as evolution intended you to - then that should logically be how you ought to live your life, even if that way of living is by society's standards considered completely insane. Right?


societies rules aren't there for your pleasure. They are there to protect everyone. My cousin was shot when a drug addict held up his store (thankfully he lived.). I really don't think I need to keep reading this topic, because no belief that accepts that is worth anything to me.

This topic is closed to new replies.

Advertisement