This is my first post on this msg board. Go me!!. Anyway, i was wondering how good the inline asm block in VC++ is. Should i use the inline asm or would it be better to write separate asm files and use MASM to assemble them in my VC++ project, like how the quake 1 engine does. -SirKnight

For simplicity in building your project, use the inline assembler. If you are going to write a decent size collection of routines for a library, i recommend using MASM and then just linking to it.

----------------------------------------
Implementation is everything. Period.
Particle Toast

Inlining gave me lots of troubles with forward references. I didnt find a good solution for it then, but maybe the new versions of the VC++ compilers can handle it now?