Are there any Float functions for cmath instead of Double
I use sqrt(), sin() and cos() from cmath and they all return doubles, and i always typecast them floats for my game, and I was wondering if there are any sqrt, sin and cos functions that are just designed to use floats which should be twice as fast i supposed because its 4 bytes instead of 8
thanks
- John Moses
Oh and for cos and sin I know I cooooould use a cos and sin table but that doesn''t work good for decimal numbers, and I need them...
- John Moses
There is no reason why this should be faster if a FPU is taking in doubles 8 bytes at a time. It all depends on how many bytes it is taking in. I think I read somewhere that all floats are taken to be doubles eventually, although I may be wrong.
Brendan
EDIT:
Nevermind, I forgot about all of the function+f functions for floats. But does it still make a difference?
[edited by - Punty50 on May 5, 2003 5:58:34 PM]
Brendan
EDIT:
Nevermind, I forgot about all of the function+f functions for floats. But does it still make a difference?
[edited by - Punty50 on May 5, 2003 5:58:34 PM]
Brendan"Mathematics is the Queen of the Sciences, and Arithmetic the Queen of Mathematics" -Gauss
sqrtf()
sinf()
cosf()
blahf()
MPU? Is that supposed to be a Memory Processing Unit?
The x86 FPU (when not running in SIMD mode) uses 80-bit registers.
sinf()
cosf()
blahf()
MPU? Is that supposed to be a Memory Processing Unit?
The x86 FPU (when not running in SIMD mode) uses 80-bit registers.
Interests: my money-pit car, computer hardware/programming, anything 3D'93 RX-7
Awsome thanks, I didn''t know it was as easy as sinf() and cosf()
Now does anyone know how to switch them to use degrees instead of radians? I know I can multiply them by PIOVER180 but that gets anoying... I thought they might have something built in...
Now does anyone know how to switch them to use degrees instead of radians? I know I can multiply them by PIOVER180 but that gets anoying... I thought they might have something built in...
- John Moses
Nope, the internal processing (on the x86 FPU at least) is done by radians, so the conversion has to happen SOMEWHERE. Write a wrapper function, if you want. Or just store your angles as radians (radians are better, nyah nyah).
How appropriate. You fight like a cow.
How appropriate. You fight like a cow.
I used these to calculate sin, cos and sqrt function in my 3d engine :
__forceinline const float __fastcall OXSin (const float x)
{
float r;
__asm fld DWORD PTR x
__asm fsin
__asm fstp DWORD PTR r
return r;
}
__forceinline const float __fastcall OXCos (const float x)
{
float r;
__asm fld DWORD PTR x
__asm fcos
__asm fstp DWORD PTR r
return r;
}
__forceinline void __fastcall OXSinCos (const float x, float &rSin, float &rCos)
{
float temp1, temp2;
__asm fld DWORD PTR x
__asm fsincos
__asm fstp DWORD PTR temp1
__asm fstp DWORD PTR temp2
rSin = temp1;
rCos = temp2;
}
__forceinline const float __fastcall OXSqr (const float x)
{
float r;
__asm fld DWORD PTR x
__asm fsqrt
__asm fstp DWORD PTR r
return r;
}
I hope it is of any help
__forceinline const float __fastcall OXSin (const float x)
{
float r;
__asm fld DWORD PTR x
__asm fsin
__asm fstp DWORD PTR r
return r;
}
__forceinline const float __fastcall OXCos (const float x)
{
float r;
__asm fld DWORD PTR x
__asm fcos
__asm fstp DWORD PTR r
return r;
}
__forceinline void __fastcall OXSinCos (const float x, float &rSin, float &rCos)
{
float temp1, temp2;
__asm fld DWORD PTR x
__asm fsincos
__asm fstp DWORD PTR temp1
__asm fstp DWORD PTR temp2
rSin = temp1;
rCos = temp2;
}
__forceinline const float __fastcall OXSqr (const float x)
{
float r;
__asm fld DWORD PTR x
__asm fsqrt
__asm fstp DWORD PTR r
return r;
}
I hope it is of any help
Oh why don''t you just go the whole way and use an arbitrary precision Taylor Series? data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0247d/0247dfff748bf5e0f1869758dd7ffe54e511cf19" alt=""
Potentially the float versions could be faster if they are optimized to not worry about the extra precision invoved in calculating the full double result... since sin/cos/tan are not single-cycle operations (last I checked...)
Note though that sinf,cosf,tanf make your code extremely unportable... I think VC++ is the only compiler that supports them... if you want to port you''ll have to do something like:
#define sinf(x) ((float)sin(x))
Not necessarily a biggie, but might be useful to know.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0247d/0247dfff748bf5e0f1869758dd7ffe54e511cf19" alt=""
Potentially the float versions could be faster if they are optimized to not worry about the extra precision invoved in calculating the full double result... since sin/cos/tan are not single-cycle operations (last I checked...)
Note though that sinf,cosf,tanf make your code extremely unportable... I think VC++ is the only compiler that supports them... if you want to port you''ll have to do something like:
#define sinf(x) ((float)sin(x))
Not necessarily a biggie, but might be useful to know.
This topic is closed to new replies.
Advertisement
Popular Topics
Advertisement
Recommended Tutorials
Advertisement