I've listed 11 axioms related to physics.

Do you have a problem with some of the axioms? Am I being too terse with some of the axioms? Am I missing important axioms?

Please, send advice, if you have the time and interest.

https://github.com/sjhalayka/papers/blob/main/review/bezier_escape.pdf

What is this for, exactly?

I am not expert in that, passing familiar with some of the physics topics, but I don't see anything “paper” worthy. You made a short summary table, so what's the point? Is it for an undergraduate homework assignment? Just for fun? Where are you referencing any of your “references”? I don't see how any of the three opening questions are answered or addressed.

Thanks frob!

This is just for fun. I have high school physics under my belt, but I did not go to university or anything like that.

The point of the paper is that defines some axioms, and uses those axioms to solve the hierarchy problem, dark matter problem, and dark enery problem.

The paper is so terse because it doesn’t need a lot of words to describe the answers to the problems. The simpler, the hardier, or so I figure anyway.

Thanks for your time!

The axiom paper is like bones, no meat. This other paper is a little meatier. I published it in 2008:

https://github.com/sjhalayka/papers/blob/main/anisotropic.pdf

As for the references, I got rid of all of them except for my two earlier papers that I’m reviewing. If there are missing references now, then anyone can look up the terms on Wikipedia until the cows come home.