Oh dear, I am still an interesting topic of debate eh? I thought we were done a few weeks ago when someone jumped to the right conclusion, but apparently not.
Ok, let me clear this up then.
I made the comment "moderators should remove unwanted images" from the following, (perhaps unlogica)l reasoning:
- Users cannot be trusted with content of their posts, for various reason, some with good intentions and some with bad intentions.
- Some error may happen, as we are not that always that logical
- Someone must be able to fix it in that case. As the OP stated a user cannot do that (and following my first step, shouldn't)
- Therefore, the only logical option left is to warn a moderator, so he can do it.
At the time, I quite missed that the OP is also a moderator. I agree that it is obvious to see, however, I don't read that information. I read the topic title, the name of the author, and the post text, and sometimes the number of posts to verify my judgment after reading the post, and not much else. The main reason for that is that you guys are freaking awesome. I never needed a moderator, because you guys jump in way before things go too far.
Even if I would have seen it, I am not sure it's relevant. The site was (is) under construction, and glitches will pop up. It's a report of a more serious problem then, but my reasoning still holds, I think.
So there you have it. I made a comment in the general sense, as to me that's the only sane solution, and I missed the OP being a moderator. If people want to attach conclusions about my logical skills for that, that's ok, as I catch myself doing illogical things all the time 
