So I'm trying to decide how some of my game ideas could turn into a reality. The first of which is perspective. Now I'm not fantastic at drawing but I can model.

So, with that in mind, what is the best way to approach modeling in 3D and converting it into an isometric asset that can be used. I.E: Would it be better to model in 3D, take an isometric perspective picture of it and then use something like photoshop to paint it to look like it was drawn?

Also, characters, if the world is built in 3D should the characters then be 3D? or has there been any success with having a 3D built world but 2D characters from an isometric perspective? I say this because I haven't seen any 'pretty' looking characters in a 3D isometric world (unless you can show me a good example?)

An example of what I can do is attached.

I know these questions are a little bit tricky to answer but any and all suggestions and advice is much appreciated!

Thanks!

Euden

look at Breath of Fire IV on the PS1, it is basically using exactly what you describe... fully 3D world made of polygons in an isometric perspective, with drawn sprite base characters.

Its also the best Game in the breath of fire series too, IMO... extremly good story and well done levels, worth a playthrough anyway :)

Just be aware that you might set yourself up for additional work, as simple 3D characters might be easier to animate than 2D sprites as soon as you move into an isometric perspective.

Both Diablo and Diablo 2 used 2d sprites of 3d models. These aren't the most recent examples, but typically it was done to target lower hardware machines. I suspect most companies now a days just use 3d models since current engines and hardware can handle it. If you've already got the models and animations, most companies will consider it more work to then take snapshots of each frame of the animation and build sprite sheets out of it. But as an independent solo-dev, do what you have to do to get your game out. :)

- Eck

I can say there is good reason to go the 3d pre-rendered to 2d sprite pipeline.

For one thing, most can agree on this, 2d games are simply more simple to make, and quicker. Much of this is tied to the art and so by doing this pipeline that advantage is negated, but other things are still gained by doing 2d. Some great game engines are geared to 2d, including for example GMStudio(by yoyogames) and Contruct 2(by Scirra). These are great engines, and tend to be quick to develop in, so you get some advantage in going 2d not only in game complexity(though 2d can have many complexities regardless) but in development time due to engine choice.

Another advantage lies in that if you simply haven't/can't learn to pixel art, and don't have the funds(or friends) to outsource your art, then 3d may be the way to go, at least pre-rendering it. I fit this case perfectly, because somehow though I've never gotten good at pixel art or even vector art, I can somehow make pretty respectable 3d models.

Another advantage lies in styling. At least for me, it is pretty easy to use the same style for all the art in pre-rendered 3d pipelines. This is because you can easily create materials that are similar, you can use the same or similar textures(if you use textures), and you can easily ensure the lighting is the same by using the same scene setup and just moving objects in and out as you need to keep everything the same.

If you get pretty good at using this art pipeline, you will find it has other general advantages. For example, once you get going, changes are much easier. You don't have to redraw all the animation yourself if you simply tweak a material or change something basic. There are exceptions to this, but for the most part things can be redone easily, including animation and material tweaks, all the way to lighting setups, for example either to change or because you want more than one in order to use different graphics in different scenes or something. Also, you can reuse some assets for different things, for example if you need a face closeup for RPG style menus or dialog boxes, or for rendering actual video scenes for the game, or lastly for other pre-rendered scenery, like if your main menu displays the character attacking an enemy or something(either video or a static image).

The last thing I will mention here....if you get good at this 3d to 2d pipeline, you have a head start for the future for example if you want to go full 3d. You've already learned much about modelling and animation and probably gotton some practice. The material settings won't be the same mostly because you need more detail than low resolution pre-renders, but much of the knowledge will still apply.