Edit: Please check my reply below for the current code.

I'm not having too much luck with this. Think of Tic Tac Toe, and trying to find if the angle contains all of the same value (such as 1). I'm operating on a dynamic, 2D array.

 
    bool isAngleWithValue(const int xPosFrom, const int yPosFrom,
        const int xPosTo, const int yPosTo, const T &value)
    {
        bool blnGreatSuccess = true;
        int width, height;  

        // ... removed validation code for demostration

        // get width and height  
        width = (xPosTo - xPosFrom);
        height = (yPosTo - yPosFrom);  
        
        for (int y = yPosFrom; y < height; y++)
        {
            for (int x = xPosFrom; x < width; x++)
            {
                if (x == y)
                {
                    if (m_array[y * m_width + x] != value)
                        blnGreatSuccess = false;
                }
            }
        }

        return blnGreatSuccess;
    }

For example, this works:

    Array2D<int> a(3, 3);
    a.fill(0);

    a.get(0, 0) = 1;
    a.get(1, 1) = 1;
    a.get(2, 2) = 1;

    if (a.isAngleWithValue(0, 0, 2, 2, 1))
        cout << "Yes!" << endl;
    else
        cout << "No!" << endl; 

But when I change a.get(2,2) to a.get(1, 2), it's still outputting "Yes!", which is not functioning correctly.

I tried researching various sites, but I can't seem to relate it to this problem. A general algorithm can be helpful too for checking diagonally.

What your code is doing is basically just checking that any elements on the diagonal of the 2D array that are within the rect (xPosFrom, yPosFrom) to (xPosFrom + width, yPosFrom + height) have the value 'value'. Try printing out what x,y positions actually ever get checked, and you'll see what I mean.

What you're looking for is probably a DDA type of algorithm. DDA stands for "digital differential analyzer". It's the kind of algorithm that's used to raster triangles/lines into 2D framebuffers, for example. What you're doing is essentially trying to draw a line across a 2D grid and check all the squares it intersects with, which is very similar to the rasterization problem.

Thanks for the thoughts. I'm just trying to think of this really simple, like checking for a win in a Tic Tac Toe game (but keeping this as a general array member function).

The idea is:

If a line starting from (x,y) is N long, no matter what direction, return true. Else, return false.

I modified the function a bit.

    ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
    /// <summary>
    /// Checks if an angle contains all the same value.
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name = "xPosFrom"> the starting x-position to check for value. </param>
    /// <param name = "yPosFrom"> the starting y-position to check for value. </param>
    /// <param name = "intPlaces"> How many cells to check for value. </param>
    /// <param name = "value"> The value to check for in each cell. </param>
    /// <returns> Returns true on success, else false. </returns>
    ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
    bool isAngleWithValue(const int xPosFrom, const int yPosFrom,
        const int intPlaces, const T &value)
    {
        bool blnGreatSuccess = false;
        int width, height;   
        int xPos, yPos;
        int times = 0;

        // validate array
        if (!isValid())
            return false;  

        // check for first occurance of finding value
        if ((m_array[yPosFrom * m_width + xPosFrom]) == value)
        {
            times++;
        }
        else
        {
            // value doesn't exist in first position. Bail out.
            return false;
        }  

        // TODO: How to check around the first position?

        if (times >= intPlaces)
            blnGreatSuccess = true;

        return blnGreatSuccess;
    }

I think I got it.. it just takes a lot of testing on each side of the cell N times.

But when I change a.get(2,2) to a.get(1, 2), it's still outputting "Yes!", which is not functioning correctly.

I tried researching various sites, but I can't seem to relate it to this problem. A general algorithm can be helpful too for checking diagonally.

You are passing in 0 and 2 as the dimensions.

Your width and height are then (2 - 0) -> 2.

You then loop from i = 0 to i < 2 -> meaning you only check 0 and 1.

So, the value at (2, 2) does not affect your result.

Yeah, I had to rearrange the algorithm a bit, and got it working finally. Thanks everyone.

Yeah, I had to rearrange the algorithm a bit, and got it working finally. Thanks everyone.

Your newer function doesn't even have a loop in it. I cannot understand how that would work either. It's only checking one location.

I know, which is why I had the TODO comment in there, but now it's implemented.

Try this.

// use Bresenham-like algorithm to print a line from (y1,x1) to (y2,x2) 
// The difference with Bresenham is that ALL the points of the line are 
//   printed, not only one per x coordinate. 
// Principles of the Bresenham's algorithm (heavily modified) were taken from: 
//   http://www.intranet.ca/~sshah/waste/art7.html 
void useVisionLine (int y1, int x1, int y2, int x2) 
{ 
  int i;               // loop counter 
  int ystep, xstep;    // the step on y and x axis 
  int error;           // the error accumulated during the increment 
  int errorprev;       // *vision the previous value of the error variable 
  int y = y1, x = x1;  // the line points 
  int ddy, ddx;        // compulsory variables: the double values of dy and dx 
  int dx = x2 - x1; 
  int dy = y2 - y1; 
  POINT (y1, x1);  // first point 
  // NB the last point can't be here, because of its previous point (which has to be verified) 
  if (dy < 0){ 
    ystep = -1; 
    dy = -dy; 
  }else 
    ystep = 1; 
  if (dx < 0){ 
    xstep = -1; 
    dx = -dx; 
  }else 
    xstep = 1; 
  ddy = 2 * dy;  // work with double values for full precision 
  ddx = 2 * dx; 
  if (ddx >= ddy){  // first octant (0 <= slope <= 1) 
    // compulsory initialization (even for errorprev, needed when dx==dy) 
    errorprev = error = dx;  // start in the middle of the square 
    for (i=0 ; i < dx ; i++){  // do not use the first point (already done) 
      x += xstep; 
      error += ddy; 
      if (error > ddx){  // increment y if AFTER the middle ( > ) 
        y += ystep; 
        error -= ddx; 
        // three cases (octant == right->right-top for directions below): 
        if (error + errorprev < ddx)  // bottom square also 
          POINT (y-ystep, x); 
        else if (error + errorprev > ddx)  // left square also 
          POINT (y, x-xstep); 
        else{  // corner: bottom and left squares also 
          POINT (y-ystep, x); 
          POINT (y, x-xstep); 
        } 
      } 
      POINT (y, x); 
      errorprev = error; 
    } 
  }else{  // the same as above 
    errorprev = error = dy; 
    for (i=0 ; i < dy ; i++){ 
      y += ystep; 
      error += ddx; 
      if (error > ddy){ 
        x += xstep; 
        error -= ddy; 
        if (error + errorprev < ddy) 
          POINT (y, x-xstep); 
        else if (error + errorprev > ddy) 
          POINT (y-ystep, x); 
        else{ 
          POINT (y, x-xstep); 
          POINT (y-ystep, x); 
        } 
      } 
      POINT (y, x); 
      errorprev = error; 
    } 
  } 
  // assert ((y == y2) && (x == x2));  // the last point (y2,x2) has to be the same with the last point of the algorithm 
}