And it still doesn't make much sense.

You got a 2014 Lamborghini completely decked out, but it has solid rubber tires.

And you got a 89 Honda Civic, and has top of the line Michelins.

Yet the Civic outperforms the Lamborghini somehow.

First, when it comes to video game performance, the graphics card is a significant factor in that performance. Think of it more like a turbo or supercharger for the CPU, giving it significantly more power to handle the task at hand. Hardly just a set of tires on the car.

Second, a Lamborghini with solid rubber tires would be absolute shit. That being said, so is an 89 Honda Civic, regardless what tires it's running.

I'd still drive that Lamborgini shit.

Regardless I still await feedback from Servant and Hodgman. Common guys I know you've lurked this a couple times.

I posted in your other thread to argue that games can benefit greatly from multi-core CPUs. I still agree with that argument

The benefits are everywhere.

I've noticed that when you have a browser open on a single-core computer, if you have 5 tabs playing Youtube videos simultaneously, the browser will have very slow performance on a free tab.

But on a multi-core computer, that doesn't happen.

The tabs get dedicated to different CPU cores.

And everyone is happy.

Do you still need help burying a corpse or digging a grave?

Look who finally decided to show up.