Strange unit vectors!!
I''m wondering if you calculus book is trying to pull a fast one on me here....
How would you normalize, say m = [1,1] or n = [2,3], using the good old u = v / |v| formula?
Either my book is consequently bogus, or I''m consequently stupid (or both..).
-meZ
|m| = sqrt(2).
unit(m) = (1/sqrt(2),1/sqrt(2))
|n| = sqrt(13).
unit(n) = (2/sqrt(13),4/sqrt(13))
Mike
unit(m) = (1/sqrt(2),1/sqrt(2))
|n| = sqrt(13).
unit(n) = (2/sqrt(13),4/sqrt(13))
Mike
"Unintentional death of one civilian by the US is a tragedy; intentional slaughter of a million by Saddam - a statistic." - Unknown
That''s exactly what I''ve been claiming all along (*phew* not THAT stupid after all). The book OTOH (Calculus w/ Analytic Geometry by Edwards&Penney) consequently claims (ie. 50% of the cases) that
u = ( |v| / sqr(|v|) ) * v
giving:
m = [1/2 * sqrt(2), 1/2 * sqrt(2)]
n = [2/13 * sqrt(13), 3/13 * sqrt(13)]
Does this make any sense at all? Does it mean anything else?
-meZ
u = ( |v| / sqr(|v|) ) * v
giving:
m = [1/2 * sqrt(2), 1/2 * sqrt(2)]
n = [2/13 * sqrt(13), 3/13 * sqrt(13)]
Does this make any sense at all? Does it mean anything else?
-meZ
Yes, it makes perfect sense. (1/2)*sqrt(2) = sqrt(2)/2 = 1/sqrt(2). You can prove this by multiplying (sqrt(2)/2) * (sqrt(2)/sqrt(2)) = 2/(2*sqrt(2)) = 1/sqrt(2). Same thing for sqrt(13).
Mike
Mike
"Unintentional death of one civilian by the US is a tragedy; intentional slaughter of a million by Saddam - a statistic." - Unknown
This topic is closed to new replies.
Advertisement
Popular Topics
Advertisement
Recommended Tutorials
Advertisement