Quote:

Original post by ChaosEngine So let me be very clear about this: fuck the pope. It's too little, too late.

Thats a fairly bad idea since he won't use a condom.

Quote:

Original post by SimonForsman Quote: Original post by ChaosEngine So let me be very clear about this: fuck the pope. It's too little, too late. Thats a fairly bad idea since he won't use a condom.

Lol, +rating for you, sir.

I don't think I'm his type though... [grin]

Quote:

Original post by Alpha_ProgDes male-male condoms cannot be ok, if male-male sex is not ok. It's not too hard to see why.

This is exactly what got me troubled along with the fact that a male-prostitute can have sex for money with females too.

So, the whole statement is confusing cause I fail to see the difference between:

- A female-prostitute having sex with a man using a condom.

vs.

- A male-prostitute having sex with a woman using a condom.

I fail to see how the two cases differ. O_o

My conclusion so far is that this pope is going to retire soon because I sense some Alzheimer in his logic.

Note: I understand that the statement from the pope is something he wrote in a book, not some sort of Encyclical stating rules over how Catholicism should be enforced by the prelate. Still, as a ""catholic"" I find it crazy.

Quote:

Original post by Alpha_ProgDes Ok, so here's the deal. Your 4 rules, A-D, (which I'm very familar with) makes sense, given the times and source. But, for instance, male-male condoms cannot be ok, if male-male sex is not ok. It's not too hard to see why.

I disagree. If male-male sex is wrong, what difference does using a comdom make? Comdoms are wrong because they're a contraceptive... between 2 men it's a non-issue.

Quote:

Original post by The Pope Alright, gay men, if you are going to butt fuck each other at least wear a condom...

Makes sense to me!

The thing that amused me the most was that the BBC edited down this to "certain types of prostitutes".

Stupid BBC.

Quote:

Original post by evolutional The thing that amused me the most was that the BBC edited down this to "certain types of prostitutes". Stupid BBC.

Actually a "male-prostitute" is a certain type of prostitute. Regardeless of any malice the BBC may have had at the moment of edition lol