Palidine, Nypyren,
as far as i know my software is the only one in the world able to reproduce self-conscious behavior, so i suggest kids stop with self-embarrassment, silly comments and non-related discussion, which is insulting and ridiculing this forum.
Quote:
1) How does this help science understand the mind. Specifically, how does this affect either the interpretation of neuro-biological or cognitive neuroscience experimental results.
this helps science understand the mind because it can DEFINE the concepts in practical terms, as already explained and examples given. specifically, it affects the interpretation of neuro-biological or cognitive neuroscience experimental results, in a way that it actually can provide concrete and practical interpretation and therefore means to construct practical experiments.
Quote:
2) In what way does it propose new testable hypotheses. If it does, what specifically are those testable hypotheses.
it is explained more than once, what part is not clear to you? if you want to talk about something other than what this thread is about, then open a new thread for whatever it is you want to talk about.
Quote:
3) In what manner does this affect artificial intelligence research. What new algorithms does is present and how are those algorithms useful.
are you blind? it is explained, you don't seem to have read it, or you simply failed to understand. so, once again, it can actually explain and physically define the following concepts:
cognition consciousness perception reflex detection emotion feeling thought instinct anticipation decision acknowledgment knowledge willingness comprehension intelligence awareness intuition recognition intention sensation mind self-awarenessalgorithm?
what are you talking about?
is said this is about the definition, it is called "abstract class" in C++, or "virtual function" in Java.
A= info input B= memory(A) C= reaction(B) D= output(B)-> A E= reaction(D)
Quote:
If you cannot concretely answer any one of those questions then I posit that your post has no "usefulness" in the context of these forums: forums dedicated to the development of computational neuroscience focusing on it's use in Video Games.
discussing the usefulness of definitions without actually applying them is just pitiful. is there anything of substance and actually related to OP that you have to say? this is very real and applicable definition, it applies correctly to any of the dynamical systems:
- charge
- atom
- grain of sand
- brick
- mechanical spring
- virus
- bacteria
- grass
- tree
- squid
- bird
- monkey
- human
- computer virus
- computer games/other software..
- any other practical case scenario...
Quote:
All you've done is present a rather poorly constructed philosophical treatise on the meaning of the words: mind, intelligence, etc. A treatise in which I can discern no practical usefulness with regards to science & programming.
and your argument is?
explanation for your ridiculous blabbering is what?
no my friend, you simply failed to understand. all you have done is explain your failings and then you missed the opportunity to articulate what in particular confused you. you don't seem to be curious about it, what's your agenda? bored?
there are four points open for discussion, if you have anything concrete to say about that, go ahead. if you don't, than just open your own thread and talk about whatever is you wanna talk there. alternatively, you may pull my tail a bit more if you wish to keep embarrassing yourself.
[Edited by - PlayStationX on February 17, 2009 12:17:32 PM]
