So I've been around Linux for a while (about 5 years now), but I remain disappointed with the window managers available. The problem is, a number of them have features I like, but each one seems to have annoyances that others don't have. For example, take Window Maker. I like it quite a bit overall, but the single most annoying thing is, as far as I can tell, clicking a window will not raise it (if there's actually a setting for this that I somehow missed, please correct me). Basically, it seems that I always end up having to compromise with my window managers. This is why I always end up using one for a few months, then go to another one. That said, does anyone else feel the same way? If so (or if not, for that matter), what window managers do you settle with and why? (This thread is intended to be for discussion purposes, so please don't just answer "Fluxbox" without giving any explanation.)

I dunno if this works in windowmaker, but in enlightenment you can either right click or alt+click a window to raise it..

Quote: Original post by eedok
I dunno if this works in windowmaker, but in enlightenment you can either right click or alt+click a window to raise it..

You can, but that annoys me that you have to do that. I'd rather just click if I'm using the mouse already. I'm all about the keyboard, but I don't want to have to use both if I don't have to (I do, however, like the feature where ALT+cick'n'hold allows you to move windows... It allows you to bypass having to click and hold on a relatively small area).

I used to switch a lot, but I pretty much just stick to Gnome now. The only annoyance I can think of is that I don't know how to add an interior menu to a panel. What I mean is that the main Gnome menu has a submenu 'Debian menu', and I would like to instead add 'Debian Menu / Applications' and 'Debian Menu / games' as separate menus on the panel.

I use sawfish because it's Gnome's default one. It has a lot of annoying features (some of which may be configurable to change of course), but it just about works.

It's not a very responsive WM and is generally sluggish. Its default skin looks pretty good and is functional.

Unfortunately, it is not designed to work with KDE apps, and some of its default hotkeys conflict with KDE apps' ones.

Also some apps (OpenOffice) create windows which have no close box, expecting you to be able to close them through the WM - I believe this is just a case of a lack of correct communication - OO actually wants those windows to be closeable, but with sawfish closing them is only possible through an obscure keyboard/mouse combo.

But I'm used to it. I might change when I next reinstall my box, something I haven't done for years.

Mark

Quote: Original post by markr
I use sawfish because it's Gnome's default one.

LIES! Metacity has been the default WM for Gnome for quite some time now. I personally hate Metacity because its window-placement algorithm sucks.

Yeah, I've looked at quite a few window managers too.

If you're willing to spend the time you can probably configure fvwm to do exactly what you want. I used it for a while, but there's a lot to configure and what I really need is just a good set of keyboard shortcuts. Perhaps that's the same complaint you had if you tried it.

I'm currently using fluxbox but if there's a blackbox variant that get support for python scripting and stays current (unlike openbox and kahakai) then I'll probably pick it up.

I use KDE. Its a bit bloated, but I think its still great.

i use blackbox, because i like its philosophy : it is an WM and only a WM. it has a clean design and useful features like the whell to switch desktop. i tried quite a lot WMs and it is the one i liked the most.

I personally use Gnome the most, and I honestly don't care what WM I'm using as long as it accomplishes the task. I have a rather fast computer that can handle the bloat of big WMs as well. [smile]