quote: Original post by Anonymous Poster
You should not assume people are beginners just because they state that c/c++ was a breeze to learn or at least you made it sound like that.
I don''t make the assumption people are novices because they state C++ was easy to learn. I make an informed guess that various people are novices based on their posting history, including the posts where they claim C++ is easy to learn.
quote:
And also them being paid or not makes no difference as far as
talent goes.
That''s true, but if they have never worked in a large team, then they are unlikely to understand what works for anyone other than themselves. People fall into the trap of thinking how they learned is how other people should learn. If someone wants to recommend C++ as a good language for caandom to begin with, I don''t have a problem with that. I do have a problem with people making such a recommendation without having a clue why C++ might be a good language for learners. In effect, if people cannot explain why they said something, then they are posting just to post. That is not the way to inform a newbie.
quote:
I believe in more informative help when someone asks a question.
OK, let''s try a different approach. If so many people think C++ is a good language for new programmers, would someone please explain why that is the case. Just to pre-empt, here are some non-explanations:
"Because I learned it and it was easy".
"Because lots of games are written in C++".
"Because there are lots of books about C++".
quote:
If you feel someone is lacking help them out rather than writing some (for them) useless piece of answer.
If someone wants to explain why they think C++ is good for beginning programmers, I am prepared to state the case for Python.