What are you hoping to get out of this thread? Is there a specific problem you're trying to solve? Are you just here to vent about old versions of OpenGL? Is there something else?

I agree that the old OpenGL library wasn't the right API in the long term (Direct X got a lot closer initially) but OpenGL won out because it was easier to draw a triangle with it and having a high-level API made it easier to deal with all of the wildly different kinds of hardware around at the time.

If you disagree with that direction, it's understandable. But if you are in 2024 and complaining that OpenGL 2.0 lacked some feature you feel is vitally important, I don't know what to say. It's in the past. There's nothing anyone can do to change it. You are shouting into the void. Buildings rendered with OpenGL 1.2 aren't going to get a lot better than Deus Ex or Max Payne. That's why OpenGL released newer versions and graphics card manufacturers released newer cards.

gamelordofdeath said:
I don't want modern features. I want to render a building. Rendering a building is a basic feature, it should be available from the beginning. OpenGL didn't support building rendering for 16 years. How do you make a game without buildings?

It sounds you want to repeat a tiling texture on the building.
If you can't do this for technical reasons and limitations, the solution is simply to subdivide the geometry, so you have a quad with unique UVs for each tile, and you can give each quad the texture you want, including support for different texture sizes across tiles.

Ofc. this increases the amount of vertices, so it has a cost.

Imagine wanting to create a realistic building with a single quad 🙂

“OpenGL didn't support building rendering for 16 years. ”
Computers don't have a “render building” button.

I never used texture arrays to build complex scenes. Unnecessary.

I found also this method:

https://community.khronos.org/t/repeat-tile-from-texture-atlas/104500/2​

It lets you repeat texture from texture atlas using shaders.

It is superior to texture array because:

-it requires opengl 2.1, not opengl 3.0.

-it doesn't force you to use same size for every texture

But it's still bad because it doesn't support GeForce 4 MX and Intel 945.

Coil said:
What are you hoping to get out of this thread? Is there a specific problem you're trying to solve?

I want to draw a building on GeForce 4 MX.

Coil said:
That's why OpenGL released newer versions and graphics card manufacturers released newer cards.

I will not use new versions and hardware because it's jewish. Every new game should support all hardware, including GeForce 4 MX.

JoeJ said:
Ofc. this increases the amount of vertices, so it has a cost.

This is understatement.

This building has 1250 windows per side = total 5000 windows.

So to display one side, one quad, you need 1250 quads.

This is not acceptable.

I have one idea for algorithm that uses low amount of polygons and allows to repeat texture from atlas, on GeForce 4 MX. The algorithm is not ideal but it is superior to using 1250 quads. I will not write how the algorithm works because I developed it on my own and it's proprietary technology. I can sell my algorithm for one million dollars.

dpadam450 said:
Computers don't have a “render building” button.

render building = render quad with repeatable (tiled) texture from texture atlas. OpenGL 1.4 doesn't support this. So it doesn't support “render building”.

The same technology is also necessary to render terrain. So OpenGL 1.4 cannot draw terrain.

dpadam450 said:
I never used texture arrays to build complex scenes. Unnecessary.

Repeatable texture from texture atlas is mandatory to draw buildings and terrain. How you draw without this?

gamelordofdeath said:
I have one idea for algorithm that uses low amount of polygons and allows to repeat texture from atlas, on GeForce 4 MX. The algorithm is not ideal but it is superior to using 1250 quads. I will not write how the algorithm works because I developed it on my own and it's proprietary technology. I can sell my algorithm for one million dollars.

Cool. Then you don't really need our help at all? You just wanted to tell us we should not use OpenGL?

gamelordofdeath said:
This building has 1250 windows per side = total 5000 windows. So to display one side, one quad, you need 1250 quads. This is not acceptable.

This is what works with your hardware:

It's nice. But it does not have 5000 windows either.

gamelordofdeath said:
I will not use new versions and hardware because it's jewish.

That's a big “yikes” from me.

gamelordofdeath said:
I will not write how the algorithm works because I developed it on my own and it's proprietary technology. I can sell my algorithm for one million dollars.

Good luck with that. Unless you have a PhD in computer graphics it's highly unlikely that anything you can think of has not yet been done many times before. Even with a PhD, you're not likely to create anything that anyone would buy, and definitely not for that amount. The only viable way to “get rich” is to make a name for yourself by publishing peer-reviewed research papers (e.g. in SIGGRAPH), then use that resumé to get a well-paying ($200k+) job working for someone else.

gamelordofdeath said:
I will not use new versions and hardware because it's jewish. Every new game should support all hardware, including GeForce 4 MX.

I think this thread is rapidly losing touch with reality. The second point on there is just out of touch.

We're long past the original subject, the claim that OpenGL can't render tall buildings or large terrain. We're also far past the point of useful discussion.

But it's the first point that's triggering here.

I don't know or care if your post was intentionally antisemitic, religious discrimination, or just meant as a disparaging term. None of them are acceptable here.

Closing the thread.