I understood it well enough at least to guess the file name is probably a bug. : )
🎉 Celebrating 25 Years of GameDev.net! 🎉
Not many can claim 25 years on the Internet! Join us in celebrating this milestone. Learn more about our history, and thank you for being a part of our community!
Gravitational acceleration calculation
@taby Reading it now. This is way over my head though. I can check for typos though, lol. One thing might be your reference to assembly programmers. If this is meant for astrophysicists they may be unfamiliar with assembly languages. It might be worth adding just another sentence of detail to prevent confusion.
Also, regarding this line
Thus, all of physics is about processes and computation
This statement would assume the universe has a processing speed / frame rate, correct? Since our current physics break at Planck time would you conclusion require new physics?
JoeJ said:
I understood it well enough at least to guess the file name is probably a bug. : )
LOL yeah, I just copy and pasted the files from another paper and edited that. ?
jonny-b said:
Also, regarding this line
Thus, all of physics is about processes and computation
This statement would assume the universe has a processing speed / frame rate, correct? Since our current physics break at Planck time would you conclusion require new physics?
I"m hesitant to say that there is a minimum time slice. Time is not necessarily quantized.
everything is a process, or sub-process.
the source of time dilation are force-carrying particles, like the graviton or the photon
P.S. The reference to the assembly language is basically me being compliant. I was told that the paper needed to be related to computer science, so there we have it.