As per your request, I won't discuss your controversial views, but as you're here for networking I feel it may be worth examining your apparent credentials. On the surface of what you've said, it sounds like you have impressive credentials and may be interesting to work with, especially for those working in sci-fi.

I have also had short stories published in a variety of places

Could you perhaps be more specific as to which places? I see you've self-published a number of stories such as 'The Aquarium', which appeared to have received pretty bad reviews. Where else have your short stories been published, and were they well received?

has had several books published, including Dragons: Lexicon Triumvirate

Is that the book featured HERE on Amazon, and HERE on goodreads.com? The reviews on Amazon seem pretty bad, with 3.6/5 stars from 29 reviews, where a large number of the 5-star reviews actually give really bad reviews in the text. Goodreads gives an average of 1.88 from 8 ratings. Has the book been better received elsewhere?

the 0th Dimension

This one seems hard to find, apart from a number of articles making fun of how badly written the screenplay appears to be. Is that the screenplay in question, and are the listed snippets an accurate sample of the text?

My writings have been seen by millions of sci fi fans

Do you have a citation for this claim? Most of the works I can find appear to have relatively small numbers of (largely negative) reviews, which doesn't seem to support the sort of exposure you're suggesting.

I worked in the editorial department of Marvel Comics.

Is it accurate that you were an unpaid intern in that department and were not then offered a paid role?

my writing abilities

Do you have some examples of where your writing abilities were well received? A lot of the reviews I'm seeing appear to be pretty negative.

If you're looking for networking opportunities, you could consider attending industry events such as the Game Developers Conference and others.

Also, my books were viewed by millions of people from some articles published in major newspapers like FOX News and CNN.

Unfortunately "creativity" isn't really a marketable skill in the industry; apart from roles where it isn't required, it's a baseline thing that's expected of everyone to a certain degree. Everyone in those roles is creative, so being creative isn't really special.

You obviously have the persistence to finish things, which is valuable, but your actual marketable skill is your (poorly received) writing. I suppose there may be someone out there who's interested in leveraging your notoriety for marketing purposes, but that could be a risky proposition that may tarnish a brand - that is to say, established brands such as Ubisoft and others are unlikely to want to associate their brand with the other views for which you are famous.

Put another way, it seems like calling yourself "a well-known sci-fi author" seems misleading given the reception of your work. It would appear to be more accurate to call yourself "a person a notoriety who happens to also write very poorly received sci-fi", noting the negative connotation of "notoriety" as opposed to "famous" or "well-known".

On a side note, please stop posting unsolicited requests for work in unrelated topics - you've already been advised of the appropriate parts of the site for that.

Good luck with your networking! :)