Pointless as it is, I will take your bait, even though I know it will lead nowhere.
But you don’t know what they prescribe in Japan. In fact, it’s illegal in many countries, not the weak sauce you claimed it would be.
So you got prescribed some japanese super drug. So, what is the terrifying name of this substance (in a language that non-japanese readers can understand, please)?
What new version?
Let me paraphrase the story line:
Examiner: Hey, what the fuck? You're on benzos!
You: Uh, I took a... laxative... can that cause it?
Examiner: No way.
You: Yeah well, I took one pill a week ago.
Examiner: You take benzodiazepines? You got insomnia?
You: Uh... Of course not! That was years ago, now I only use it very rarely when I have different work schedules.
You (to GD): So this is what happened...
Me: Dude... seriously... wtf.
You: Why, what! It was just one pill, you don't know what you are talking about. Fuck, fuck.
Me: Dude... seriously...
You: It was for a broken tooth. Only once.
Me: Ow man, Dude...
You: You got no clue, it's super hefty stuff. I used it only twice to escape pain.
So basically, you went from "no biggie, took one pill a week ago" through "taking rarely for jet lag and work schedule" through "took it for a broken tooth" to "it's not the weak sauce you think".
You also didn't tell the examiner about the broken tooth although now you seem to think that this is a valid application. Instead, you told him stuff about "work schedule".
Don't you even realize how your story changes every few moments?
It is only the second time I resorted to sleeping pills to escape pain and not otherwise worth mentioning.
That doesn’t change the fact that I mainly use them on plane rides or abrupt changes in my schedule, etc.
Not worth mentioning here since it's none of the GD.net community's business (or my business) what you do with your health, that is true.
They're certainly worth mentioning during your examination, since they're inadequate use of controlled substances and you are applying for a position in a program where that's serious business, and they are certainly hard exclusion criteria.
They would be hard exclusion criteria if they were revealed when you applied for any kind of job (or position) in any place where security/reliability matters in any significant way.
The first post likely mentioned it was at a bar where I sometimes play piano.
I remember you telling having been at the police 3 times because a guy you are on good terms with tried to kill you. Pushed you down the stairs from behind. Witnesses, blood on your shirt, police does nothing because you're a foreigner.
You had a friend (who didn't witness the scene) talk to the police, and nothing. Eventually it turns out the guy is a bar owner next door to where you live, you sometimes play piano in that bar, and occasionally have a drink. That evening, you too had a drink, but you weren't drunk when you insulted him. He kept pushing you although you apologized.
Now it's an accident.
But... It doesn't really matter what the exact reason was. It doesn't matter whether you insulted him or whether it was an accident.
What really matters is that it's such a twisted, contorted story from Bizarro World. I have maybe experienced one or two such stories (but not nearly as bizarre as this one!) in my life. You seem to experience one such story every few weeks. That is what I'm on about.
or the jakuza girl and transgender story
Not getting the point. I refused to be involved in organized crime and I politely refused the transgender.
The point is what your post was about. The essence of that post was "Fuck, all Japanese are perverts. I dated 3 girls, one wants to kill babies, the next is a jakuza, and the third is a transgender".
I've dated women from different cultures including that particular one before (though admittedly two decades ago), and I've never had a woman of the kind you describe.
For the filming of a TV show.
Nice try, but no.
Making a movie where you play someone who lost his legs is one thing. Posting that photo with the line "I wish for my legs back" on a thread which is about what people had on their Christmas wish list is another story.
You didn't bother to reveal the "joke" until a full day later. You intentionally deceived people into thinking you had had an accident. Do you really need attention that direly? If that is the case, you seriously need help.
Otherwise, it's still extremely bad taste. If you are in doubt about whether it was a good joke, make the same post on an amputee forum, and see what reaction you'll get.
No one turns on the news to hear stories about someone who recovered from a liver disease
Someone turns on the news. Is that what matters? Dude? Seriously?
Besides, this:
That would be seeking sympathy and attention, which only an asshole would do. Making this post is like making an obligation to die. [...] I was diagnosed over 6 months ago with a liver disease.
followed by the revelation months later that when you said "liver disease" you were talking about "fatty liver disease" is just another such example.
You knew exactly that you were not going to die from that condition before you posted that crap.
And with that, I'll stop my sermon, because it leads nowhere.