Every ####ing time I run an antivirus on my laptop, it targets every single C++ compiled file I have as a virus.
Do you's know what is causing this ?
Right now I am using QT, but same thing happens when I use BloodShed.
Every ####ing time I run an antivirus on my laptop, it targets every single C++ compiled file I have as a virus.
Do you's know what is causing this ?
Right now I am using QT, but same thing happens when I use BloodShed.
I cannot remember the books I've read any more than the meals I have eaten; even so, they have made me.
~ Ralph Waldo Emerson
I personally also get similar issues a fair amount with Avast, where it seems to be rather critical of any newly compiled binaries, apparently *especially* ones compiled with GCC.
one time, it also went and basically kept moving any VirtualDub related binaries to the virus vault, apparently having randomly decided that VirtualDub was a virus or something...
Current Status / Downloads: http://cr88192.mooo.com:8080/wiki/index.php/BGB_Current_Status
YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/BGBTech
Main Page: http://cr88192.mooo.com:8080/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
Avast flags anything using GNU gettext compiled with any version of MinGW I've seen as "Malware" and considers many other executables as "dangerous" because none in their "community" has had the same file scanned before, too. The only workable solution is to uninstall all this shit (whitelisting the compiler and the development partition doesn't work properly). Kaspersky is even worse.
I've submitted bug reports considering the gettext thing repeatedly too, only reaction was the usual keep-consumer-busy-with-nonsense dance without much effect.
So chances are that whatever-you-use is just as bad. Antivirus live panic just doesn't work well with development. Heuristic scanners are pathetic and signature-based ones are not much better, so they will gratiously flag anything they haven't whitelisted as malware. Also, the perceived threat makes users more likely to spend money on malware and accept the detrimental impact of AV software on their system (which is often worse than the impact caused by the actual malware).
It's much the same as if your governmental thugs kill a few people by crashing an airplane into a building and later arrest some presumed "bombers". The perceived threat makes people much more compliant with other measures (giving up privacy rights, going to war) that they would never accept otherwise.
Who has his programming pc online anyways ?
S T O P C R I M E !
Visual Pro 2005 C++ DX9 Cubase VST 3.70 Working on : LevelContainer class & LevelEditor
And I thought this thread is about "How to create a C++ executable file that antiviruses label them as viruses?" or "How to create a virus?" type of thread.
And boy my anticipation and excitement skyrocketed... and dropped like dubstep.
If one thing I hate about anti virus, it would be labeling a lot of compressed exe as virus - and this include Microsoft own anti virus.
I love watching a lot of 64k intros, and some big demos .exe are compressed too, for whatever reasons.
Who has his programming pc online anyways ?
I do, for example. What's wrong with being connected to the internet as such? It's not like you couldn't make a modern system secure against intrusion from outside (even Windows can be made secure).
It's the stuff you download and execute you have to worry about, but then again it's not any more dangerous than anything you install/execute off a CDROM or an USB stick.
Your AV software must be detecting that your code is infected with GPL. You're going to have to nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.