This is what you get access to as crossbones: http://www.gamedev.net/page/reference/authorcp?do=queue
You can click on articles to peer-review and vote.
This is what you get access to as crossbones: http://www.gamedev.net/page/reference/authorcp?do=queue
You can click on articles to peer-review and vote.
This is what you get access to as crossbones: http://www.gamedev.net/page/reference/authorcp?do=queue
Hmmm Publish date: Jan 19 2038 03:14 AM on many articles, probably bug from closing, random DateTime though :D
Hmmmm... I see no Crossbone stuff on my posts? I see I can watch a lot of under review articles
Edit: Ahh on my next upvote hehe :)
"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education"
Albert Einstein
"It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education"
Albert Einstein
At the risk of sounding like a dumbass, what is crossbones+?
You get access to the GDnetDeathRay++. Just kidding, that's for GDnet+ Members only.
But check out the top of the page below the navigation buttons:
[attachment=17249:Crossboens.PNG]
The peer review is mostly just reading through the article and marking Yes (it makes sense and is helpful), or No (and giving a brief reason). It's not an academic style thing where you're suggesting revisions paragraph by paragraph, for those who are curious. You can leave detailed feedback in the comments if you want to, too.
-Mark the Artist
Digital Art and Technical Design
Developer Journal
It's not an academic style thing where you're suggesting revisions paragraph by paragraph, for those who are curious.
<kvetch> but it probably should be </kvetch>
Tristam MacDonald. Ex-BigTech Software Engineer. Future farmer. [https://trist.am]
It depends probably from person to person - F.e. I do read through whole article and review it paragraph-by-paragraph (at least into the gedit, then write some shortened version into comments, with personal opinion). Although I don't strictly insist on academic style (from the "stylistic" point of view) - informal view is also fine, as long as it delivers the information in "a good and understandable way".
My current blog on programming, linux and stuff - http://gameprogrammerdiary.blogspot.com
This is what you get access to as crossbones: http://www.gamedev.net/page/reference/authorcp?do=queue
Hmmm Publish date: Jan 19 2038 03:14 AM on many articles, probably bug from closing, random DateTime though
Not random at all: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_problem
So was a GD-net+ then I became a Crossbones+ and now I am a Prime Member. I am confuzzled...am I still paying for my gd-net+ now? Did I just lose access to GDnetDeathRay++? Can the next promotion be to Irrational? SO I get that Prime Member is in some way a differentiation but I am still not exactly sure what the differentiations were based on...anyone know yet?
So was a GD-net+ then I became a Crossbones+ and now I am a Prime Member. I am confuzzled...am I still paying for my gd-net+ now? Did I just lose access to GDnetDeathRay++? Can the next promotion be to Irrational? SO I get that Prime Member is in some way a differentiation but I am still not exactly sure what the differentiations were based on...anyone know yet?
I can't work out what the title is based on either. I tried initial crossbones group, reputation, number of posts, user activity, upvote/downvote ratio, articles submitted, join date, age, profile length, amount of red in the avatar, number of letters in the username.. but nothing seems to really fit. I believe they are being hand-picked, actually, because I see members become "prime members" every now and then, which would make sense I think.
By the way, weren't you a moderator as well?
“If I understand the standard right it is legal and safe to do this but the resulting value could be anything.”