Referring to them as a company rather than “a group of people who wanted to replace GIF” is easier.
As for JPG/JPEG, JPG = Jay-Pee-Gee, JPEG = Jay-Peg or Jay-Pee-Ee-Gee (I would go with Jay-Peg).
MPG = Em-Pee-Gee, MPEG = Em-Peg.
It all makes sense and I am fine with pronouncing parts of it as words as long their spellings match what I am saying. If they want us to call it “Ping”, they should make it PING, not PNG. JPEG and MPEG have no problem being 4 characters long, so why does PNG, especially since they seem to want it to be?
If they want it to be pronounced as “PING,” they have full power in making it so with a very simple extra letter in the extension. Until then, they are just trying to be clever/cute. I prefer brute-force logic over attempts to be cute with pronunciations.
People do what they want, and what makes something "correct" is if society deems it acceptable.
I am not saying you are wrong, but I don’t agree it should be happening. Putting “ain’t” into the dictionary is like saying humans’ lack of desire to put any effort what-so-ever into proper spelling, grammar, punctuation, vocabulary, etc., is acceptable. It is not acceptable to be lazy. Same thing with “snuck”. Who cares that there is already a perfectly good and historically correct way to use the past-tense of “sneak”. “Snuck” is common so let’s just throw it into the dictionaries instead of trying to educate people.
Yes it happens, but it is not right, and I will never take part of getting a non-existent word put into the dictionary.
L. Spiro