Look on iTunes for "The Complete Guide to Everything" and you'll hear the same piece of music in their intro theme. It was very strange hearing it in Bastion, a kind of "Can they do that?!" moment.

Hmmm, I don't think they sound alike... sure, they're in the same key and use arpeggio motives on eighths, but I don't have to tell you that's nothing uncommon. ;)

But just to be clear, are we talking about the motives I scribbled down in the attachment?

Edit: Now that I look at it, they both begin with a similar rising arpeggio landing on the 5th of A minor, I can see where one could see that as a similarity. But it's quite possible I could find a track using that cliché even in my own small library.

Ah that's the harp bit in the intro (which I agree is different) - The bit I'm talking about is most audible at 01:29 in the Bastion tune. I don't have a notation tool on this machine, but it sounds like a string/flute combo (possibly synth) with a lower cello and bass drum part.

I'm coming to thinking it's probably some generic piece of music composed for a sample library which has been appropriated by Darren Korb for the Bastion soundtrack. Makes the job easier I suppose!

I realise this has gone very off topic though and into one man's obsession!

I realise this has gone very off topic though and into one man's obsession!

And fed mine. I played a bit of Bastion but didn't get to hear all the music, and am delighted to have found the soundtrack on YouTube.

I'm coming to thinking it's probably some generic piece of music composed for a sample library which has been appropriated by Darren Korb for the Bastion soundtrack. Makes the job easier I suppose!

That would be my guess. It's faster in the podcast version than it is in the Bastion OST. Also the looping point (or the splicing) in the podcast is a bit sloppier or perhaps it was intentional to create a syncopated rhythm? In the Bastion OST the looping is much more straight forward, less syncopated. Either way - they are very similar and most likely loops from a library which both the podcast and the video game licensed out. Given how cheap and plentiful canned musical loops are these days... it's very likely.

I also think it's important to note that the US Federal Supreme court recently ruled on public domain:

Supreme Court Says Congress May Re-Copyright Public Domain Works

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/01/scotus-re-copyright-decision/

To be honest I haven't heard anything since... but this might make things a whole heck-of-a-lot messier.

Ah that's the harp bit in the intro (which I agree is different) - The bit I'm talking about is most audible at 01:29 in the Bastion tune. I don't have a notation tool on this machine, but it sounds like a string/flute combo (possibly synth) with a lower cello and bass drum part.

Oh, you're very right, that seems to be the same exact arrangement! Sorry I missed that.

Yes, seems to be a library track. But Darren Korb made very good use of it, I really like how it ties in with the rest.

Not to derail the conversation further, but I was on another forum and someone mentioned that they recognize some Apple Logic loops in the Bastion soundtrack as well. Not to detract from Darren Korb's work at all (it's still a great soundtrack), but I was wondering what peoples' opinions were on using canned library loops in their soundtracks?

It hadn't actually occurred to me as an option before, but it sounds like there's a line to be trodden between legitimate usage of loops and musical "cheating", where you're just chucking together a load of other people's work.

While I haven't tried it myself it sounds like a good means of gaining inspiration, and also quickly building up a large soundtrack without having to spend time producing every single sound yourself.

Thanks for the replies and derail

Since we're somewhat on the topic, imagine this scenario

Bill is a game developer, he makes a game but the game has no sound, he decides to make an advert 'buying' sound and music to use in his game. Bob replies to the advert, claims he is legit etc and gives music to Bill, Bill puts the sound in his game, launches the game and gets sued for millions, loses his job, his wife and kids leave him and his dog dies.

What should Bill have done to ensure the music was genuine, without hiring expensive lawyers / fact checkers, would it be as simple as getting a signed declaration from Bob with him saying it is legit? If so how exactly would that work without 'witnesses'.

Probably best for Business / Law section, sadly when I made this thread I never noticed that section

My situation at the moment is, I am towards the end of finishing my game, but it has no sound, although I am quite good at playing the piano I typically avoid composing, mainly because I can spend weeks trying to make something and it still wouldnt be complete and chances are it will not sound great for the scene I was after. Now I am ok with spending money for music but I cant afford a legal team to ensure everything is legit and as much 'fun' as it would be composing, I would prefer to stick to the development side of things for now.

First off - I'm not a lawyer. So take my input with a grain of salt and always seek legal advice before signing something.

Bob replies to the advert...
[/quote]

First off save the advert. Document what claims are being made as this would help establish that you were seeking a service provided by this person/company. If the company conducts bad business then you, as am unknowing customer, shouldn't be held liable. If you cannot save the advert then save all emails, IMs, etc with the client before you seal the deal. Explain clearly what you need and what you're after then save his responses. All of this will help document and prove the type of working relationship you, as the customer, created.

...would it be as simple as getting a signed declaration from Bob with him saying it is legit?
[/quote]

Yep. That's what I'd do. Create an agreement that, in the case of any legal action related to the audio provided, the composer/sound design (or merchant selling the items to you) will be responsible for any and all costs and indemnify both you and the game. You could probably find one online. If not, talk to a lawyer or ask someone who knows about the law so you can create the appropriate kind of langauge. Keep all records and communications with this artist or merchant. The more mainstream you go - the more likely the merchant will have done due diligence and less likely that you'll face any legal issues related to audio. But if you're dealing with a one-man company the chance is there... especially if they're not well known.

I've had to sign similar agreements or contracts with a clause basically saying that if the music or audio is found to be in copyright - I would be held responsible and not the team or the project.

If so how exactly would that work without 'witnesses'.
[/quote]

I don't think you really need a notary for something like this. Instead I would send the document in an email, which you CC yourself on and explain what it is and why you're asking for it to be signed. Most freelancers have had to do this before and will be fine signing it. Then save both digital and hardcopies of that agreement. If anything should happen you have a very clear paper trail which shows the audio provider understood and agreed to what the clause states.

Hope that helps,

Nate