Hi!
A few OpenGL lovers and I are writing a completely new set of OpenGL tutorials
http://en.wikibooks....g#Modern_OpenGL
We start straight with shaders, and replace all legacy 1.x functions with 2.x replacements (we also have a section on upgrade tips). We stick to OpenGL 2.x core profile / OpenGL ES 2, which is now widely available in mobile and desktop platforms.
The tutorials are influenced by NeHe's DIY style (and flying cube!), but start anew and follow a different structure. We also have a section on non-gaming topics such as Scientific visualization.
The tutorials are under the Creative Commons CC-BY-SA, and the code samples are placed in the public domain, and available from the gitorious repo:
https://gitorious.org/wikibooks-opengl
What do you think?
What topics are you interested in?
New tutorials on Modern OpenGL - request for comments
You mention OpenGL 2.0 as modern everywhere, so I assume that's not a typo on your part. I really hope that you mean OpenGL 3.0 if you refer to the tutorials as modern, and quickly looking at them, it appears that's what you really mean. OpenGL 2.x is just as old and deprecated as OpenGL 1.x.
I don't have any comment on the tutorials themselves though because I don't have the time the look into them into any greater details, but you should at least get the version correct if you are in the position to teach it. But new tutorials and materials to spread the modern usage of the API are always welcome, as long as they are of sufficient quality
I don't have any comment on the tutorials themselves though because I don't have the time the look into them into any greater details, but you should at least get the version correct if you are in the position to teach it. But new tutorials and materials to spread the modern usage of the API are always welcome, as long as they are of sufficient quality
I just checked your tutorials for another minute, and it appears your code is a mix between the old deprecated style and the core profile which could explain your use of OpenGL 2.0. But if you claim modern and core profile tutorials, you should really stick to the modern API and the core profile only.
I can understand that the GLUT version you use doesn't create a actual core profile rendering context, but you are using extensions to get the corresponding functions as an acceptable replacement.
I can understand that the GLUT version you use doesn't create a actual core profile rendering context, but you are using extensions to get the corresponding functions as an acceptable replacement.
I mentioned that we chose OpenGL 2 because that's what is available now, in mobile devices (OpenGL ES 2), on the web (WebGL), and also on desktop (OpenGL 2)
Indeed you have more cutting edge (3/4.x) version on desktops, but only on desktops. We'll gladly upgrade whenever OpenGL 3 and 4 gain more widespread availability.
I used the term "modern" to distinguish from the 1.x series of tutorials that represent most of the available documentation on the net (including NeHe's), as in Joe Groff's Intro to modern OpenGL.
The code is meant to also work on OpenGL ES 2 which does not offer old-style functions at all.
I don't see where there's a mix of old-style and new-style functions in the tutorials - where did you see this?
Indeed you have more cutting edge (3/4.x) version on desktops, but only on desktops. We'll gladly upgrade whenever OpenGL 3 and 4 gain more widespread availability.
I used the term "modern" to distinguish from the 1.x series of tutorials that represent most of the available documentation on the net (including NeHe's), as in Joe Groff's Intro to modern OpenGL.
The code is meant to also work on OpenGL ES 2 which does not offer old-style functions at all.
I don't see where there's a mix of old-style and new-style functions in the tutorials - where did you see this?
The primary deprecated thing I saw was the lack of buffer objects. You don't need buffer objects for OpenGL ES 2.0, but they are required for core profile compatibility. For example, if you do this upgrade you are core profile compatible as you claim, and you will stay compatible with OpenGL ES.
If you want to stay with OpenGL 2.0 to stay even with OpenGL ES 2.0, then that's fine, but you should reconsider the modern and the core profile aspects of your tutorials.
If you want to stay with OpenGL 2.0 to stay even with OpenGL ES 2.0, then that's fine, but you should reconsider the modern and the core profile aspects of your tutorials.
Thanks for your comment.
In OpenGL 2 you can either:
- pass a C array of coordinates (what the tutorials start with), or
- create a VBO (which is introduced later, and already used in the scientific tutorials).
Compliant already
What's deprecated is using immediate mode with glVertex* functions
In OpenGL 2 you can either:
- pass a C array of coordinates (what the tutorials start with), or
- create a VBO (which is introduced later, and already used in the scientific tutorials).
Compliant already
What's deprecated is using immediate mode with glVertex* functions
I went ahead and reimplemented the tutorials with Vertex Buffer Objects from the start. It's actually more simple that way, even if the first tutorial is slightly harder
Sound like a great idea. Don't get me wrong on my previous posts that, I admit, may sound a bit negative. It was mostly regarding the core profile and the lack of required vertex buffers I was commenting on.
But on your last comment; if you find that introducing VBO directly makes it unnecessarily difficult for your target audience, you can always wait a tutorial or two to introduce them. You are targeting OpenGL 2.0, so I suppose that's a fair thing since you can do without VBO in 2.0.
But on your last comment; if you find that introducing VBO directly makes it unnecessarily difficult for your target audience, you can always wait a tutorial or two to introduce them. You are targeting OpenGL 2.0, so I suppose that's a fair thing since you can do without VBO in 2.0.
I eventually moved VBOs in the 2nd tutorial.
- That way, the 1st tutorial remains as simple as possible,
- I just came across a client-side array in an Android NDK OpenGL ES 2 sample, so I thought it would be fair to present both ways to the reader.
Aside from that we've been progressing with Phong lighting and 3D function plotting
Brother Bob: keep posting comments and don't worry, I'm pretty sure other people had the same thought but just didn't tell ;)
- That way, the 1st tutorial remains as simple as possible,
- I just came across a client-side array in an Android NDK OpenGL ES 2 sample, so I thought it would be fair to present both ways to the reader.
Aside from that we've been progressing with Phong lighting and 3D function plotting
Brother Bob: keep posting comments and don't worry, I'm pretty sure other people had the same thought but just didn't tell ;)
Beuc, I'd like to say thank for your time and effort in not only choosing to make these tutorials but also showing newbs like myself how to use modern opengl with GL 2.
The problem with the latest and greatest is that not everyone is able to use these features on their machine, while webgl, ES 2 and GL 2 have a much more wider base, while still being modern at the same time.
I have to brush up on my math 1st, but I've already bookmarked your site.
Good looking out.
The problem with the latest and greatest is that not everyone is able to use these features on their machine, while webgl, ES 2 and GL 2 have a much more wider base, while still being modern at the same time.
I have to brush up on my math 1st, but I've already bookmarked your site.
Good looking out.
This topic is closed to new replies.
Advertisement
Popular Topics
Advertisement