Quote:
Original post by mattnewport
Quote:
Original post by djz
As someone who respects the GameDev.Net community, can someone perhaps elaborate on exactly how I was unhelpful or unfriendly?
Basically this: I strongly disagree with pretty much every misguided opinion you presented in your post defending the protests at the weekend. Does this give me the right to come round your house and smash up your shit? It doesn't seem to have occurred to you that the protesters' viewpoints may not be getting the attention you think they deserve because people think they are wrong not because they are ignorant sheep who are blinded by the mainstream media and whose attention must be forcibly grabbed by engaging in property damage and other forms of violent protest.
Was
every opinion in my post misguided? As a person I constantly try and challenge assumptions I make about myself, and I can't believe that I am
that oblivious to truth. Can you find at least one opinion with merit so I might rebuild my worldview around that sole nugget of truth? ;)
In any case, the comparison is silly, since no protester wants to go to your house to smash your shit. In any case, I assume you are in favour of the state having a
monopoly on violence and if that is your position; we can agree to disagree.
Me personally, I strongly disagreed with the smashing of the TD Bank's windows, as they were in no way relevant to the cause at hand. HBC, as far as I'm concerned are fair game given their historical record. Not from myself personally, outside from outrage that the "Go Canada" Olympic merchandise isn't even made here, but our indigenous have a very valid beef with those guys, even if it did all happen years ago.
Quote:
If you want to change minds about the issues then peaceful protest and debate are legitimate ways to go about it. In the Internet era it has never been easier or cheaper to disseminate non mainstream or dissenting opinions widely without resorting to violence. Violent protest might be justified in a truly repressive state like China where other forms of dissent are heavily restricted but it isn't justified in Canada.
I believe it is justifiable in Canada so that we do not
become a truly repressive state. The draconian security and oppressive by-laws that have been enacted specifically because of the Olympics are disconcerting; I abhor seeing my civil liberties erode.
If people have not been blinded by mainstream media, and truly
do accept this debacle, then the message we are sending our government is that it is A-OK to violate our civil-liberties (via warrantless search and seizure of anti-Olympic material, evading the freedom of information act on technicalities) - I suppose I am just incredulous that this is what people really want for our country.
Quote:
Destruction of property just looks like the actions of a bunch of spoiled kids who throw a tantrum because they aren't getting the attention they seek. I hope the protesters who engaged in such activities are prosecuted.
Out of curiosity, what is your opinion on
hockey riots? We could be heading for one of those if Canada loses a major game, and I hope all who vilify the political protesters enact the same judgment if such a thing comes to pass.