Advertisement

Is the Earth conscious?

Started by March 12, 2009 06:53 PM
91 comments, last by polymorphed 15 years, 7 months ago
Quote: Original post by owl
Quote: Original post by Witchcraven
Is the Earth conscious?


Conscious of what?


That it exists. Its hard to imagine how something like self awareness could arise from matter and forces interacting. Since I do not really believe in supernatural stuff, it leads me to wonder if any sufficiently complex systems are in some way or another aware they exist. Not to say alive. That is an entirely different conversation, which is probably much much easier to answer.

As for the equation being conscious, I doubt it. It also only exists withing you mind. Although if an equation were conscious I would put my money on diophantine equations or on nonlinear differential equations.
--------------------------I present for tribute this haiku:Inane Ravings OfThe Haunting JubilationA Mad Engineer©Copyright 2005 ExtrariusAll Rights Reserved
Quote: Original post by trzy
I've often wondered if non-biological entities, like planets, rocks, and automobiles, might be able to "perceive" reality in some way (our high level of perception and awareness is what we consider to be sentience.) Surely a tree does not see, hear, smell, and feel pain as we do, but it is a complex system and whose to say that as a whole, it does not experience reality in a higher-level way? Perhaps complexity itself endows a system with the ability to experience the universe in a way we might consider to be "living", even if it cannot actively respond because it lacks the functionality of a nervous system. Perhaps the more complex something is, the greater the level of awareness and perception it has.

There is such kind of theory-noosphere.It's something smaller thah Earth but more than mankind (ant-hill has another "quality" than one ant,it's not a simple sum of all inhabitants).I remember a lot of tolks here(in Lounge) about computer's AI,Turing test etc. But the main question is: what makes new-born child a human-speach, vision, parents, society? No one pay attention to this "usual miracle".From one hand,wtere was a real "Mougly" in Indian jungles,he had a wolf reason.From other- blind and at the same time deaf people can become a part of society without any abilityes for communication (well,almost without).
Advertisement
Quote: Original post by slayemin
Quote: Original post by trzy
Quote: Original post by slayemin
Quote: Original post by trzy
Perhaps the more complex something is, the greater the level of awareness and perception it has.


By that reasoning then, computers should already have a very high level of awareness and perception. They don't.

Therefore, either A) They aren't complete enough or B) Complexity doesn't cause awareness and/or perception.

I'm voting for B.


How do you know computers aren't aware? Their sensory inputs are different than ours, but they are certainly capable of reacting to stimuli.


So is a piano. The input is the keys, the output is a sound. It's also reacting to stimuli. Then, is a piano aware too?

Consider the mathematical function:
F(x) = x^2;
The input is any number. The output is the square of that number. Is the function aware because it's performing an operation on input and spitting out output?

I think that just because something can sense input and react to it doesn't cause it to be aware.


The mathematical function is probably a bad example because it is purely abstract and does not exist physically. The computer and piano could well be aware. How would we know it doesn't have some rudimentary perception? As the OP pointed out, everything can be broken down to simple physical interactions -- why we are able to perceive is a complete mystery. There is no explanation for this phenomenon and it's a very hard topic to grapple with. It's even more bizarre if you consider the absence of free will -- then there really is little difference between a piano and a human, mechanically, other than the level of complexity.

One thing that is generally agreed upon is that awareness is some sort of fundamental property of reality. Whose to say it isn't related to complexity itself and therefore a property of systems we don't consider to be organic or living?

There's simply no way you can logically argue one way or another that a microprocessor or piano is aware. We don't even know how to explain this property, let alone try to reason about it.
----Bart
Quote: Original post by Witchcraven
Quote: Original post by owl
Quote: Original post by Witchcraven
Is the Earth conscious?


Conscious of what?


That it exists. Its hard to imagine how something like self awareness could arise from matter and forces interacting. Since I do not really believe in supernatural stuff, it leads me to wonder if any sufficiently complex systems are in some way or another aware they exist. Not to say alive. That is an entirely different conversation, which is probably much much easier to answer.

As for the equation being conscious, I doubt it. It also only exists withing you mind. Although if an equation were conscious I would put my money on diophantine equations or on nonlinear differential equations.


I personally think that conciousnes is just a tool. I don't really think it would be useful for the the earth to be self-concious, at least not more than for a ball attached to a raquet with a string. Most of what it "does" and what happens in it internally doesn't depend on any decision of it's own.
[size="2"]I like the Walrus best.
Quote: Original post by LessBread
That generalization is fair enough for your question. I don't agree with the Chinese room example because it posits that rules and tasks make up the consciousness, not the person abiding by the rules and performing the tasks.
And yet a person is conscious, despite the fact that he doesn't contain any sort of homunculus, but rather is made up of decidedly non-conscious elements, the same elements that make up decidedly non-conscious things, like molasses. If there's no secret Consciousness-Boson hiding in the brain, then what is there to create that consciousness other than the rules and tasks binding the bits of the brain together?
consciousness is a nebulous human concept. Our minds and even councious are the result of electrical chemical raections.

These same electrical chemical recations not only appear naturaly on earth, but on "dead" planets like Mars, throughout the solar system, and even the universe too. Even if these reactions could be shown to shape themselves into mirrored models of our own. The scale and scope is far too vast for anything relateable in human terms.

As George Carlin once said "The Earth needs plastic, likely the only reason we are here." [wink]
Advertisement
Now that my universe thread has cooled down, I'm going to join this thread to get my dosage of philosophy. And as usual, I'm going to settle on the far fringes of what's considered sane.
Quote: Original post by Witchcraven
If you look at any part of the human body, it essentially breaks down into basic physical forces. How does consciousness arise from that?

It doesn't.
Consciousness does not arise and can not arise from a brain. A brain is just a network of interconnected neurons which works in three basic steps:
while (!brain.dead){   GetInputFromSenses();   Think();   Act();}

In fact, a brain is just an organic CPU.



If a brain is conscious, then why isn't a CPU conscious? They are both machines that are composed of non-conscious materials. If you're going to say that a brain is conscious, then a CPU has to be conscious as well. Either that, or you'll have to explain what makes a brain different from a CPU.

It's important to make a distinction between the terms self-awareness, consciousness and intelligence. Intelligence can exist in the absence self-awareness or consciousness. Self-awareness can exist in the absence of consciousness or intelligence.

Our human brain is intelligent and self-aware. Some animal brains are intelligent and self-aware as well, but most lower animal brains are just intelligent. No brain is conscious, however.

I define self-awareness as an entity's ability to recognize itself as a separate entity in the world it perceives. I define intelligence as the ability to process data in some form - a microchip is intelligent by this criteria. I can not define consciousness however, as it is entirely subjective. Consciousness is simply out of this world. I guess I can approximate it by defining it as a subjective experience of existence, but that definition is not perfect.

Quote: Original post by Sneftel
And yet a person is conscious, despite the fact that he doesn't contain any sort of homunculus, but rather is made up of decidedly non-conscious elements, the same elements that make up decidedly non-conscious things, like molasses. If there's no secret Consciousness-Boson hiding in the brain, then what is there to create that consciousness other than the rules and tasks binding the bits of the brain together?

Very well put.
while (tired) DrinkCoffee();
Quote: Original post by polymorphed
Now that my universe thread has cooled down, I'm going to join this thread to get my dosage of philosophy. And as usual, I'm going to settle on the far fringes of what's considered sane.
Quote: Original post by Witchcraven
If you look at any part of the human body, it essentially breaks down into basic physical forces. How does consciousness arise from that?

It doesn't.
Consciousness does not arise and can not arise from a brain. A brain is just a network of interconnected neurons which works in three basic steps:
*** Source Snippet Removed ***
In fact, a brain is just an organic CPU.



If a brain is conscious, then why isn't a CPU conscious? They are both machines that are composed of non-conscious materials. If you're going to say that a brain is conscious, then a CPU has to be conscious as well. Either that, or you'll have to explain what makes a brain different from a CPU.

It's important to make a distinction between the terms self-awareness, consciousness and intelligence. Intelligence can exist in the absence self-awareness or consciousness. Self-awareness can exist in the absence of consciousness or intelligence.

Our human brain is intelligent and self-aware. Some animal brains are intelligent and self-aware as well, but most lower animal brains are just intelligent. No brain is conscious, however.

I define self-awareness as an entity's ability to recognize itself as a separate entity in the world it perceives. I define intelligence as the ability to process data in some form - a microchip is intelligent by this criteria. I can not define consciousness however, as it is entirely subjective. Consciousness is simply out of this world. I guess I can approximate it by defining it as a subjective experience of existence, but that definition is not perfect.

Quote: Original post by Sneftel
And yet a person is conscious, despite the fact that he doesn't contain any sort of homunculus, but rather is made up of decidedly non-conscious elements, the same elements that make up decidedly non-conscious things, like molasses. If there's no secret Consciousness-Boson hiding in the brain, then what is there to create that consciousness other than the rules and tasks binding the bits of the brain together?

Very well put.


I disagree with your model. It implied there is some sort of seperate soul/consciousness thing which is rather metaphysical. I do not think there is anything metaphysical about any of this. Your definition for self awareness is also my definition for consciousness.

And I do wonder if a pentium could in some wierd way be aware of its own exitence in some wierd way no one will probably ever understand. What is really so special about the human body other than its complexity? Its not like its made out of of special living protons. Like you said, the brain is an organic cpu. The body is just an organic machine. Yet somewhere in there some wierd stuff happens where we realize we exist.

How do we know that non conscious elements like molasses are non conscious? I am not really even sure you are conscious. I just cannot communicate with molasses to ask it.
--------------------------I present for tribute this haiku:Inane Ravings OfThe Haunting JubilationA Mad Engineer©Copyright 2005 ExtrariusAll Rights Reserved
Quote: Original post by Nypyren
Time to argue semiotics.


Signs and meaning?

Quote: Original post by Nypyren
To say "Earth is conscious", you are adding attributes to the existing term "Earth", and most people capable of thinking about consciousness in this manner already have a pretty inflexible definition of what "Earth" means, and how part-whole relationships work in general.


That's partly why I stipulated a system. The other part was to reconnect us with the Earth, as I found the question reminded me of discussions concerning the mind and the body and the tendency to separate them from each other.

Quote: Original post by Nypyren
The goal of avoiding confusion with the existing definition and be able to say that the unified entity -- the planet and all of its inhabitants -- is definitely conscious by means of those inhabitants suggests that you either fully define it that way each time you mention it until your definition replaces the old one, or come up with a proper stand-alone term for the concept which is not confused with the existing one.


The proper stand-alone term is Gaia, if I'm not mistaken, per Lovelock.
"I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes." - the Laughing Man
Quote: Original post by Sneftel
Quote: Original post by LessBread
That generalization is fair enough for your question. I don't agree with the Chinese room example because it posits that rules and tasks make up the consciousness, not the person abiding by the rules and performing the tasks.
And yet a person is conscious, despite the fact that he doesn't contain any sort of homunculus, but rather is made up of decidedly non-conscious elements, the same elements that make up decidedly non-conscious things, like molasses. If there's no secret Consciousness-Boson hiding in the brain, then what is there to create that consciousness other than the rules and tasks binding the bits of the brain together?


The Consciousness-Boson only manifests near temperatures at absolute zero. [grin]

The Chinese Room example also presumes the consciousness of the person feeding in data.

The brain isn't bound together by rules and tasks but by blood vessels and the like.

What is the largest sensory organ of the body? What role does it play in consciousness?

"I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes." - the Laughing Man

This topic is closed to new replies.

Advertisement