🎉 Celebrating 25 Years of GameDev.net! 🎉
Not many can claim 25 years on the Internet! Join us in celebrating this milestone. Learn more about our history, and thank you for being a part of our community!
Minimum Apple hardware Specs
Author
I've recently bought a 1.8GHZ mac mini as a backup mac while my 2.4GHZ MacBook Pro was in the shop.
So now that my macbook is back, I think I should keep this thing around and use it as a minimum targeted machine because it is the lowest model Apple sells right now.
What surprises me the most is that this little box is really powerful for what it is - but still probably pails in comparison to any PC.
Quote: Original post by MrRageDepends on the PC - there are plenty of small PCs with less juice than that baby. Also worth noting is that OS X is significantly more resource-friendly than Vista, and typically feels snappier than XP or most Linux distros (just subjectively, as it is very responsive).
What surprises me the most is that this little box is really powerful for what it is - but still probably pails in comparison to any PC.
Wow you are making my old powerpc laptop feel sad since it's only a 500mhz powerpc model!
I still use it on a daily basis though for everything except games;)
I still use it on a daily basis though for everything except games;)
Quote: Original post by daviangel
Wow you are making my old powerpc laptop feel sad since it's only a 500mhz powerpc model!
I still use it on a daily basis though for everything except games;)
I have one of those around, G4 TiBook - still running strong ;)
Quote: Original post by swiftcoderEh, only if you are careful to feed OSX enough RAM. Vista's a lot worse than XP in this regard, but they still come off better than OSX, which is extraordinarily memory hungry.Quote: Original post by MrRageDepends on the PC - there are plenty of small PCs with less juice than that baby. Also worth noting is that OS X is significantly more resource-friendly than Vista, and typically feels snappier than XP or most Linux distros (just subjectively, as it is very responsive).
What surprises me the most is that this little box is really powerful for what it is - but still probably pails in comparison to any PC.
Quote: Original post by PromitQuote: Original post by swiftcoderEh, only if you are careful to feed OSX enough RAM. Vista's a lot worse than XP in this regard, but they still come off better than OSX, which is extraordinarily memory hungry.Quote: Original post by MrRageDepends on the PC - there are plenty of small PCs with less juice than that baby. Also worth noting is that OS X is significantly more resource-friendly than Vista, and typically feels snappier than XP or most Linux distros (just subjectively, as it is very responsive).
What surprises me the most is that this little box is really powerful for what it is - but still probably pails in comparison to any PC.
True, but RAM is cheap these days, and Macs have always been RAM-hungry (even back in the System 7 days). I would recommend a minimum of 2 gigs for any computer, Mac or otherwise.
This topic is closed to new replies.
Advertisement
Popular Topics
Advertisement
