Hehe, I love C/C++. Java? I''ve unlearnt it long ago.
Slow is one thing, back at university time, we didn''t get to use any standard implementation environment for Java like IDE for Visual C++. So I hate it since then.

Forgive me, I''ll go to sell chicken rice if C/C++ is dead. Want me to learn Java again? Well no way. Rather sell chicken rice. Hahaha.

Only my opinion, that was what I think. Probably not true at all, but, hey, when I hate Java, I just hate it. Hahaha!! :D

>The only problem is that it is compiled at run time.
(it == java)

Java is NOT compiled in runtime.
The jvm takes time to load, yes. But your java-programms/classes are not compiled at runtime!

You compile it to byte-code with the free tool javac.


Most of you don''t have a clue what you are talking about thought.

nils_h: they were talking about the "Just In Time" compiler - which does infact compile at runtime.

quote:

---

Original post by nils_h

>The only problem is that it is compiled at run time.
(it == java)

Java is NOT compiled in runtime.
The jvm takes time to load, yes. But your java-programms/classes are not compiled at runtime!

You compile it to byte-code with the free tool javac.


Most of you don''t have a clue what you are talking about thought.

---

Well, you compile it to byte code and then what happens at run time? So tell me, oh great exhalted guru. It is either interpreted by the JVM, or a JIT compiler compiles the byte code into instructions which are native to the platform it is running on.

Get a grip. Get a clue. There aren''t any processors out there that run byte-code natively (except maybe the Crusoe with proper code morphing software loaded). Something has to happen at run time (interpreted/compiled).

quote:

---

Original post by Anonymous Poster
Get a grip. Get a clue. There aren''t any processors out there that run byte-code natively (except maybe the Crusoe with proper code morphing software loaded). Something has to happen at run time (interpreted/compiled).

---

Java chips are real.
EETimes

Java has near C speed with a vastly reduced development time. That''s why it is popular.

The fanatic is incorruptible: if he kills for an idea, he can just as well get himself killed for one; in either case, tyrant or martyr, he is a monster.
--EM Cioran

Opere Citato

So the data says that I can perform an FFT with Java faster than I can with C!? I''d like to know where VB code falls in-between those lines.



Magmai Kai Holmlor
- The disgruntled & disillusioned