quote: Original post by Veovis
Nice Coder. Look at the Dates. You're really bringing back alot of OLD threads that died a long time ago.

But he's responding earnestly. I know that it's a taboo thing to "necro" here but I think that a genuinely intellectual topic like this could stand on its own feet even a few years later.

Anyway, Nice Coder, you should look into some of his and others' threads along these lines. Of interest:

Using Lisp (or another language) to generate fictional characters

Clean slate

A program to fabricate and articulate a plausible interlude


Cheers.

[edited by - woodsman on April 19, 2004 7:16:51 PM]

quote: Original post by firewindshadow
Agrees with most of it but which user feedback but "tastes" is not a very efficent way to build a model on, or at the very least, hard to measure a user''s feedback; you can''t have all the npc in a town goes up to the player and asks "do you like my <style> cloth?"

But you can work up some time of associative property between any and all possible choices open to the player. If a player speeds through dialogue, making speech choices quickly and tends to choose the most violent solution to a problem I think you could easily set it up so that the game realizes this and adjusts the gameplay accordingly. The same goes for someone who explores every inch of a level, talks to every npc and so forth. Certain assumptions can be made, though the determining of those is obviously very dependent on the game itself.

I wouldn''t be surprised to see the next generation of consoles come complete with controller built-in heartrate monitors.

You wanna know when people feel the most emotion in your games? Use the SDK''s built-in heartrate monitor API and let your imagination do the walking

A classic bishop_pass thread...

what does bishop pass do actually? he doesn''t show anymore on gamedev??? however i would be able sooner (in mouth scale)to show something that adress his problem (generation of all sort around dramatic interest)

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
be good
be evil
but do it WELL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I spent a few months last year interacting with Bishop. He''s pretty annoying most of the time, but he does make contributions that are at least fairly articulate. The problem is that in threads like this one he tends to lecture more than he discusses. Ah, well.

On topic, what are some good examples of real implementations of this idea? Is it ever worth the investment?

quote: Original post by Neoshaman
what does bishop pass do actually? he doesn''t show anymore on gamedev??? however i would be able sooner (in mouth scale)to show something that adress his problem (generation of all sort around dramatic interest)

He doesn''t post here anymore, or at least hasn''t in some time for reasons beyond this thread. Anyway, I''d definitely be interested in what you have to say as this fascinates me.

quote: Original post by Iron Chef Carnage
I spent a few months last year interacting with Bishop. He''s pretty annoying most of the time, but he does make contributions that are at least fairly articulate. The problem is that in threads like this one he tends to lecture more than he discusses. Ah, well.

...

quote: Original post by Iron Chef Carnage
On topic, what are some good examples of real implementations of this idea? Is it ever worth the investment?

I''m not sure about real world examples though I''d like to see what''s been done. I wish I had more free time for investigation into this area.

Hmm.

I''ve toyed alot with ideas on how to make dynamic gameplay. In fact, it''s one of my favorite ideas. So far as I know, however, it''s never been done to any great effect with a story-based game.

Nethack is a classic example of a game which is different each time and, in fact, its gameplay could be made to adapt to the player instead of the random number generator. Just keep track of certain player actions and adjust the probabilities of generation accordingly. Players who aren''t searching for hidden doors could end up in a dungeon of more obvious and immediate challenges, instead of stumbling around frustrated because a hidden door bars them from continuing.

This would be against the original ''idea'' of Nethack as a game; having the dungeon adapt to the player''s playstyle would make it a different experience entirely, but it could still be fun.

The problem with doing this to a story as opposed to with level designs or monster placement is that people have a much stronger grasp of what makes sense in a story. Dungeons can be hollowed out in random directions, and who knows what motivates monsters to place hidden doors. But the human mind is so attached to the concept of cause and effect that one slip up in a story will ruin it.

Stories are actually how people learn and remember. If you talk to someone who can memorize the order of a deck of cards by looking at each for 3 seconds, they''ll probably tell you that they make a story about how each card leads to the next. We do it all the time, and we know immediately when it breaks down.

To make a working story on the fly you would need to be extremenly careful and you''d need to imbue the ''computer GM'' with a very keen sense of what makes sense for a story, not to mention give it a way to keep things interesting and exciting. It''s bordering on the realm of AI programming, something I personally have never been good at comprehending ^^;;.

quote: Original post by Woodsman

quote: Original post by Neoshaman
what does bishop pass do actually? he doesn't show anymore on gamedev??? however i would be able sooner (in mouth scale)to show something that adress his problem (generation of all sort around dramatic interest)

He doesn't post here anymore, or at least hasn't in some time for reasons beyond this thread. Anyway, I'd definitely be interested in what you have to say as this fascinates me.

quote: Original post by Iron Chef Carnage
I spent a few months last year interacting with Bishop. He's pretty annoying most of the time, but he does make contributions that are at least fairly articulate. The problem is that in threads like this one he tends to lecture more than he discusses. Ah, well.

...

quote: Original post by Iron Chef Carnage
On topic, what are some good examples of real implementations of this idea? Is it ever worth the investment?

I'm not sure about real world examples though I'd like to see what's been done. I wish I had more free time for investigation into this area.

Hmm.

a topic about both advance ai and low structure of my analysis on the subject

actually i have find dinamic story fairly easy to achieve once you document yourself OBJECTVILY on story (mean also what other field say about it, linguistic, narrativist, writer, psychologist, cognitivist)

the major flaw i have find from those you study story generation is ideology, this lead to subjectivity and you would midd the point, because you don't want to see story for what you don't want it could be and then discard possiblity that could lead more close to their actual desire, the seek the house in the room of the house, the second things is that they want the last step before the first and put the roof before the floor, which more difficult to build the house

i have aim low and build complexity around the core

first what is a story?? a story is a succession of event which are relate by someone with a structure that help the information being understandable for the audiance
actually ALL game ARE dinamic story, best, game SHARE THE SAME STRUCTURE as story (and not game only, but it's out of topic), this make easy the analysis of the two
the two focus around a goal to be acheive and then all the cast get his role around their fct toward the goal (protagonist, antagonist, etc...), it's a good deal to analyze game as themselves two

but we are not satidfy aren't we??
it's seems that story is much more...
actually that's all story is, succession of event
once a game end it became a story which can be told
game are story in potential
but what are the MORE that miss the definition, isn't something special to story???

look at the thread

a game that make you cry
if you look carefully you see that people talk more about DRAMA
yes, drama is that which make story interesting, but what is drama?? isn't drama the telling of the human nature?
story actually has millenium experiance about telling drama, but all story is not about drama

what about game? did game could provide drama?? let's see at actual game, most focus on activity (doing) and external problem, rather than being (psychology) and internal problem which is the core of drama, in game we shift into traditional form of story to tell them

then back to game, what the main problem with story in game??
the problem come that game stress choice (base on question in a kind) while traditional story give you the answer directly without choice, the problem is that we had been raise to see drama in one way only...

problem is that we have focus more in WHAT and HOW rather than WHY, a lack on analysis and insight drive by ideology and desire which mask us the purpose of technics use in traditional story
as said before game is more about choice, all the drama then takes place here, the player by giving the answer (reacting) change the state of the problem which then produce another question (interaction), then the whole evolve dinamically.
actually it's the process that a writer face when writing, each scene is a case and the writer is a king of god player which provide the answer but also decide the next question and update the world (both the game and the player), the more close of game as dramatic generation is GMing (or DMing)
in traditional story we have a vocabulary that adress problem of dramatic content, using this vocabulary we shape and provide this content, the problem is now how to we do this in term of gameply mechanism (rather than using cut scene and the kind which belongs to traditionnal story tellings)
but since we accept this as given (how and what) and forget that they actually exist for a purpose (the why) we have trouble creating vocabulary for game (without knowing what problem resolve a particular technic we could translate/find him into new media)

drama are possible in game, and dinamic pltting is still writing

(to be continued if you want)

any comment?

i apologize for my POOR english

a lot of link on the subject


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
be good
be evil
but do it WELL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

[edited by - neoshaman on April 20, 2004 12:49:39 AM]

[edited by - neoshaman on April 20, 2004 12:59:33 AM]

Ok... this is a really good topic and we could be all developing the next-generation titles in no time if we get something out of this

Here's my view on the subject: if you try to develop an AI that understands the world in order to keep consistency, you'll see that this task is REALLY hard. There is however another way to keep consistency - simulation. Soooo, to make a game like this, you would first have to simulate an interesting world, you can't ask an AI agent to figure it all out. This could be achieved with some simple systems like demographics, economics, some simple physics (I'm not talking about rocket science here, some of them are really easy to implement if you do some research), and planning AI entities with basic goals, which is in my opinion the easiest way to make them look alive, busy and intelligent. For this to work the world must be truly dynamic - by this I mean that you shouldn't be lazy when you're scripting what everything depends on. If there's no food because the evil player decided to burn down the crops, NPCs will die, and some of them will use the planning system to solve the problem probably by stealing - stuff like that. Just try to see how you can break down these situations into little pieces that work together to get some effect. Sorry I kinda let myself ramble on too much Here's a link, read this page and I'm sure you'll immediately fall in love with it (there's a series of articles on that subject there if you're interested)

http://www.skotos.net/articles/dawnof27.shtml

Ok... assuming you have this interesting dynamic world, like all games should have. Then you can have an AI entity that looks at stuff and tries to throw interesting situations to the player. It should have some knowledge of cause and consequence, like this: how can I make the player happy? (looks up some list of actions that may achieve this) -> he likes dueling with rude humans, so I'll let him do that. how? (the conditions are: an NPC is angry and he's near the player; again look for actions that make this happen) -> by chosing some NPC that looks like this, making him angry and ordering it to go to a place near the player. This uses the same planning system, just with different sets of actions - which means less work for you

The AI would only influence stuff that should be random and the AI of the NPCs, to make it believable. It can't just decide that a portal should open out of nowhere and monsters pop out. Or something that in the context of the game world would look even less believable.

[edited by - Jotaf on April 21, 2004 3:35:38 PM]

[edited by - Jotaf on April 21, 2004 3:38:34 PM]