Simple Turn Based Combat Game - Opinions Needed
Hi guys,
As a nice distraction from our normal job, me and a friend are working on a little mini-game. Our goal is to finish it within 1 week of our start date so simplicity is the key.
We''ve decided to do a turn based combat game, kind of like chess with extras. Currently we''re thinking of an 8x8 board. The game would be played by 2 players.
The game would be successfuly won by "killing" the opponents king and keeping him "dead" for at least 3 turns.
Currently we''re thinking of having the following pieces:
king - can move 2 squares in any direction and has no abilities
queen - can move 2 squares in any direction and can "resurect" the king.
knight - can move one square north, south, e or w. Can deal 1 damage using his sword to the square directly in front of him.
Archer - Can move one square in any direction. Can deal 1 damage upto 3 squares away. Can only deal damage on squares running NW, NE, SW, SE.
Shield Bearer - Moves one square in any direction, absorbs damage from the square directly in front without dying.
So on any given turn each player would move a piece and then decide which way he/she wanted it to face.
Actually this is harder to descibe than I thought it would be.
We already have a pretty clear idea what we''re doing, but I thought I''d post it anyway and see if anyone else was interested in throwing some suggestions in.
We''d like to tweak it so a game takes less than 30 mins but there''s a lot of variety and strategy. Does anyone think something like this would be fun?
August 26, 2002 10:43 PM
sounds like some strange variations on chess.
this sounds like a pretty fun game - multiplayer options would be great.
i like the idea of being able to ressurect the king. so it would be a plus to get rid of or trap the queen early on.
would you be able to take the ''pawns'' - either archers or shield bearers'' to the opposite side and change them (as in chess and checkers - you can make them queens, etc)
just a thought- the game sounds like it would be interesting!
-geo-
this sounds like a pretty fun game - multiplayer options would be great.
i like the idea of being able to ressurect the king. so it would be a plus to get rid of or trap the queen early on.
would you be able to take the ''pawns'' - either archers or shield bearers'' to the opposite side and change them (as in chess and checkers - you can make them queens, etc)
just a thought- the game sounds like it would be interesting!
-geo-
How bout an assasian that can instanly kill the king (but not kill anything else) that moves like the kinght in chess (L shaped move)?
Kars
Kars
KarsQ: What do you get if you cross a tsetse fly with a mountain climber?A: Nothing. You can't cross a vector with a scalar.
August 27, 2002 06:59 PM
you might look for the rules to STRATEGO - there are players 1-9 (i think) where 1 is the general down to 7, the private
8 is the miner
and 9 is the spy
ex: 6''s can kill anything =>6
if a 6 fights a 6, both die
miners can kill miners, spys, defuse bombs
spys can ONLY kill other miners AND the general
the general can kill anyone except the spy.
just an idea
-geo-
8 is the miner
and 9 is the spy
ex: 6''s can kill anything =>6
if a 6 fights a 6, both die
miners can kill miners, spys, defuse bombs
spys can ONLY kill other miners AND the general
the general can kill anyone except the spy.
just an idea
-geo-
quote:
Original post by Anonymous Poster
you might look for the rules to STRATEGO - there are players 1-9 (i think) where 1 is the general down to 7, the private
8 is the miner
and 9 is the spy
ex: 6''s can kill anything =>6
if a 6 fights a 6, both die
miners can kill miners, spys, defuse bombs
spys can ONLY kill other miners AND the general
the general can kill anyone except the spy.
just an idea
-geo-
Just to correct... I believe you meant to say that spies can only kill other spies and the general. And I believe the general can kill a spy if it attacks first, although it''s been a long time so I may be wrong here. Either way, Stratego is a good example of simple rules that lead to a lot of complex behaviour.
[ MSVC Fixes | STL | SDL | Game AI | Sockets | C++ Faq Lite | Boost | Asking Questions | Organising code files | My stuff ]
I think this game sounds simple and fun... my favorite type of game.
A mage piece might be interesting... some suggestions for their function:
1. A mage can deal 1 damage to any sqaure two spaces from it. A group of mages (adjacent to one and other) will increase the amount of damage. 2 mages together cause 2 damge, 3 3, etc.
2. Moves by teleportation... can move to any sqaure n,s,e, or w of it, with the ability to move through other pieces. This might be too powerfull, so limit the number of spaces to 4 or something. (This also might be an interesting feature for the archer piece... a kind of backstab)
3. Perhaps an area effect damage... damage 1 point in a 4x4 area... or any two sqaures... ect.
I don''t mean for the mage to have all of these abilities, but these were some examples I could come up with.
- Jason
A mage piece might be interesting... some suggestions for their function:
1. A mage can deal 1 damage to any sqaure two spaces from it. A group of mages (adjacent to one and other) will increase the amount of damage. 2 mages together cause 2 damge, 3 3, etc.
2. Moves by teleportation... can move to any sqaure n,s,e, or w of it, with the ability to move through other pieces. This might be too powerfull, so limit the number of spaces to 4 or something. (This also might be an interesting feature for the archer piece... a kind of backstab)
3. Perhaps an area effect damage... damage 1 point in a 4x4 area... or any two sqaures... ect.
I don''t mean for the mage to have all of these abilities, but these were some examples I could come up with.
- Jason
This topic is closed to new replies.
Advertisement
Popular Topics
Advertisement
Recommended Tutorials
Advertisement