Advertisement

Is it a good idea to have a main story that changes the entire world in a (multiplayer) RPG?

Started by July 20, 2023 02:32 PM
2 comments, last by kseh 1 year, 4 months ago

For example, if a city is destroyed or some evil demon is awoken that raises undead throughout the entire world, how can you make that work in a multiplayer game?

If the player still has quests in that city, what happens to those? Or if you have relatively normal quests and suddenly there are undead everywhere, who would really care about e.g. delivering a love letter?

And even that is solved, what about other players? Do you just not see them if they're in a different phase of story progression?

Should I just not do this and have those events happen before the game starts, like e.g. in The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom where they awake the Demon King before the game really starts? But then I can only tell the story through memories, which doesn't feel right.

Lord of the Rings Online solved this by letting you travel to previous states. But it is very weird to see Théoden die in the battle of the Pelennor Fields, then take a horse back to when he still lives to finish another quest.

Sure, destroying a city would only affect that city, so you can just let that happen before the player gets there, maybe have them participate in the battle, but then you have no real emotional connection to that city, you never really saw it before the destruction. And that would not even work for the undead thing because that would affect the entire world.

That's a great question. Imagine the Akira manga as a game. Boom goes the Moon.

Advertisement

I've never really seen the point of an online multiplayer game where you're the same hero as everyone else going through the same story. They're just not my thing.

The world might have major states and events but you can still figure out quests and side-quests given that state. Just be sure of a path for new players to have a fun experience in the "new world" which may or may not coincide with the path of players that were there at the beginning. A new player doesn't have to be "born" in the middle of the insanity. It's probably reasonable that there's some areas where it's safe for humanity or at least where they've adapted and a new player could start. It'd be a different start than a player that was in the game before the apocalypse but then maybe that's something that appeals. And I have to figure that the "civilized" world may well have come to an "end" but there'll be no shortage of love lorn NPCs with a letter to deliver to someone.

And if your game is successful, you could maybe run additional servers that start at the beginning again.

This topic is closed to new replies.

Advertisement