Question: what is the worst case? OK, I know anything can happen, but a "realistic" or "typical" worst-case? How would the legal owner/holder of the name act first time? Because if they just send me a cease-and-desist, I can remove the reference and that's it. But if they sue me for a lot of money (as a damage they suffered for some reason), that's not OK.
Usually, in cases such as this, is there any "actual" negative consequence one would need to face, or usually a removal would solve it?
Worst case could be extreme. Lawsuit over trademark infringement, trademark dilution, unlawful competition, misappropriation, and more.
More realistically if they were upset it would be a C&D order demanding your web site remove all references to their products, services, names, and trademarks.
Generally it is bad form for you to do it unless there is no other way for you to do it. But sometimes there is no other way to express it. As I wrote above, if possible describe the genre and the activity rather than naming the product.
As an example, if you were building a review website comparing multiple games, it would be impossible to review the games without giving their names. You don't need to include their trademarks or other things, but in those cases you would need to give specific names to things.
I personally would not want to include it. You are saying "this game is a knock-off of a cool game", which tells people they should go get the other game instead.