No, I'm pretty sure the majority of the people here didn’t care what I meant.

Fixed.

Rude/Off topic??? Do you really mean this or is this just fake PC outrage?

Fairly obvious that it was heart-felt since your post is the only one posted by a real human that I have seen get deleted by a moderator in a very long time.

If the 2 halves of your brain added up to more than 2 brain cells you would have seen this fairly easily.
I can’t believe in this century we still have dopes who are so delusional as to believe that they would have grown up the same way even if they had been born in a different location, especially one which they somehow consider beneath them now.
If you grew up there, you would agree. Period.
And no, you are not above being a South-American cannibal if that is where your birthplace puts you.


I will not go off-topic again.
This is my thread and you will not be a racist prick in it again.
Failure to comply will result in me pestering admins and moderators to use the full force of the warning-hammer without prejudice. Which may or may not lead to long-term future minor complications to you.
You have been warned.


L. Spiro

Seems like everyone is focused on China's foreign policy. What about what's going on

inside of the country? There's a lot of discontent in China (corruption, incompetence,

unfair treatment of migrant workers, pollution, legal theft of property, etc.) and the people

aren't as happy with the CCP as many would have you believe.

One very popular boogie man is Japan. Nowadays Japanese culture is either uber-kawaii

or has a thing for tentacles (no, I'm not being nice or fair :) ), but back in WWII, Japan's

treatment of its conquered subjects was horrid. To their credit, the Japanese have

apologized and made some reparations, but for a domineering regime like the CCP, a

boogie man is convenient.

Before anything else, there were Chinese citizens coming over and "protesting".

They're agitators. The newspapers in China write about this, everyone is temporarily

distracted and the CCP buys some time.

And no, no war over these islands. Whatever resources they contain, China can buy

from others. Also, if US has to turn on China, China loses its biggest trading partner.

US will suffer higher prices, China will have an entire population that's pissed off and

ready storm the Bastille.

Japan and US know this. The Japanese are just tired of idiots coming on Japanese

soil (as recognized by international law) and don't want to keep looking like pansies

after shaming themselves to hell and back after WWII.

Look, if China sells those bonds, then China's going right down with the US and the rest of the world economy. There will be turmoil in the world market. It's not as if this is a one way thing. Who will the Chinese sell those cheap manufactured goods to?

You can look at it from another angle: Right now, they're selling their goods to someone who is never going to pay them. It is impossible to be ignorant of this. Nothing on the world is worth less than a piece of US money or an US cheque. Well, maybe an US credit card.

The only reason why these things are nevertheless "worth something" is because a) the USA are bullying everyone with wars and embargos (but a country the size of China needs not be afraid of that) and b) because there is a silly notion of "trust" and "handing off debts" in this world. Meaning that if someone tells you that they promise to pay, you pretend to trust their word, because there is likely some bigger fool who will believe you and give you money (which, itself, isn't backed by much but a promise) in return for a bond on those debts.

Who would buy the bonds/certificates if China threw them at the market? Nobody, this isn't necessary at all. Assume China throws a billion US dollars (or two) on the market. US dollar rate will go down to zero in 10-20 seconds. Automated traders will catch up a significant drop and immediately sell everything they have to avoid being the last fool to sell, amplifying the effect further and finally causing a crash that nobody can absorb (this happened in March 2000, although on a much smaller scale). The USA will be incapacitated within minutes. There's not enough money in the world to stop such an avalanche, so dollars and anything related to them will be toilet paper in minutes.

People will revolt in the streets. But also, institutions like law enforcement and the military are paid in dollars, and they wouldn't risk their butts knowing it's just toilet paper they work for. It's hard to start a war when your soldiers no longer follow you, when there's burning cars in the streets, and when your people are knocking at your door wielding pitchforks. It is also a very unlucky condition when the people who drive the heavy tanks and wield the machine guns are unhappy. You really want to be able to pay them, because when you can't you're totally fucked.

Would this affect the rest of the world? Certainly. Would this destroy a few other countries? Probably, at the very least it would destroy every major bank in Europe (who have significant enough dollar investments so they wouldn't recover). Would this destroy China? Unlikely. It would certainly be "uncomfortable", but not necessarily much more.
There's this saying "I care as much as if someone topples a sack of rice in China". This is reciprocal. They're big enough so they need not care, and unlike everyone else, they have production lines for everything. We can't do without China, but they can do without us. And they know that.

Heck, you wouldn't even be able to buy a T-shirt if China wasn't making them. Everything you need for your daily life comes from China. Including 95% of the parts in the computer you're using to read this (the other 5% are probably from Taiwan...).

Without them, we're simply unable to survive as it is. But that's not true for them.

Nobody will want to risk this. Nobody.

And that's why I'm sure there will be no war. The USA may shake an angry fist and maybe they call back their ambassadors (oh how very sorry the Chinese will be about this serious punishment!) but in the end, if China chooses to take those isles, then that will just be it.

I get what you mean by war not happening for financial reasons. However, I disagree when you say that China could absorb a global financial meltdown. Let's look at what would happen if US currency became moot. The US would be out of the picture for good. The next countries to go would be most of the European countries, like the UK, France, Germany, etc. I don't see Middle Eastern oil producing countries absorbing such an impact either. Japan would not stick around too long either. So let's assume that China does not go moot. Somehow, miraculously, even though demand for the yuan will drop, they 'survive'. China's economy is export dependent. Therefore, they need people to sell their cheap product to. So who would theoretically be unaffected by an American collapse? Latin America? They would be hit very badly. Russia? Maybe, but Russia is not exactly enough to make up for the dissipated trade. African countries? Again, they would not be able to make up the deficit, as there simply isn't much of a market. India? Again, unlikely. So that doesn't leave China with many options does it? China has no market for its goods within the country. One thing that we must understand is that China is a heavily export dependent country. If those exports disappear, all the gains they've made will disappear with the exports. The cash they've accumulated will not be enough to support an enormous country, the large majority of which is poor. Moreover, China has been known to inflate its numbers....so if we throw that in their, then the situation changes.

Seems war is likely, but not (at first) between China and Japan, but between North Korea and X.

New sanctions drawn by the U. N. have prompted a reply from North Korea in which they explicitly state that they will put an end to the 1953 cease-fire that ended the Korean war. Which is North Korean for “We will attack someone.” Since the cease-fire was between North Korea and the United Nations, it is not clear who exactly they will attack, but likely candidates are South Korea, Japan, and…

…Alaska.

North Korea believes they are still actually in a state of war, claiming that the treaty was not a peace treaty but an armistice.

Their threats have done nothing against the sanction, which is expected to take effect this week. If the sanction is “matter-of-fact” and if North Korea’s threats are “matter-of-fact”, then going to war is “matter-of-fact”.

It was previously asked what Korth Korea would gain by going to war.

Apparently their 30-year-old leader seems to think there is something, but most likely he is simply put into an impossible situation.

They see Westerners as bullies and strongly want to appose them if for nothing other than martyrdom. If he is to maintain the (misguided) respect of his country he has to stand up against America. It is not likely that he considers any possible chance of winning any war, but his original plan to gain the respect of his people has backfired.

His original stance was to gain the respect of his minions by defying the United Nations and proceeding with military upgrades and nuclear weapons studies.

Unfortunately, once you start doing that as a means of gaining respect from your people, you have absolutely no choice but to keep going until war eventually breaks out and your country is destroyed. Expecting the United Nations to bend and suddenly give you a free pass is simply not realistic.

The people do not like America and he played on that without thinking far enough ahead due to his lack of experience and young age.

My opinion: It is about time, and still too little.

I am tired of sanctions and “if you ignore us again”. They will ignore you again. Get a clue. They don’t even have a choice anymore, as any backing down would undo all his hard work to get the respect of his “people”.

I am glad these are the toughest sanctions ever put into place, but:

#1: They should be tougher. As in complete full 100% sanctioning. Not reducing medical aid and food to 50% or 20% of normal, but 0% of normal.

#2: And it should have been done in the last sanctions so that this time would be military action instead of more sanctions.

It is time to put an end to North Korea.

I have actually dated someone from North Korea (who wanted me to go to North Korea) and I do not say this out of prejudice for the people but rather for love.

Look at the difference between South Korea who are thriving and happy and North Korea who are starving and delusional. It is time to set them free and show them what it means to have freedom, money, and even food. Not to be forced to live inside their own little snowglobe but to be free to slowly and quietly invade and take over Japanese media.

A war with North Korea is economically viable as it would be one of the shortest wars in history. They would not be backed by a single country in this instance.

In fact it would actually be a good thing in the long-run as once Korea is re-united it would mean the same number of allies for America, but one that is bigger and more profitable.

So let’s just hurry it up, for the sake of the people.

L. Spiro

America won't invade NK because, despite how annoyed they are that them, China are still on their side.

If you shoot at NK China will have to get involved. The only thing likely to sort out NK would be China deciding 'enough is enough' and doing it themselves at which point NK becomes another part of China.

Granted, the region would be more stable but you won't see a united Korea from this.

Edit:
I'm also not convinced it would be a 'quick' war either.
NK have man power still and, depending on the state of the population with regards to their impression of the west, the population is still large enough that you might end up entrenched in a war you can't get out of.

Out of the USA and China the latter has a better chance of taking control without having to wipe out most of the population to do it.

Look at the difference between South Korea who are thriving and happy and North Korea who are starving and delusional.

That's not quite true. At least it doesn't suggest so the fact that the main cause of death of young and middle aged people in South Korea is suicide. That doesn't says "happy" at all. Thriving yes, happy... It doesn't looks like.

Are the North Koreans happy? I don't think so either. But its no excuse for skewing the comparison to make it look worse than it is.

No one wants the government of NK to collapse because that would precipitate the largest (perhaps) refugee crisis ever. Of course, neither does anyone want to get nuked or invaded. I think we're set to play provocation-sanctions-aid game for some time to come.

It is time to put an end to North Korea

Yes, America should liberate North Korea like we liberated Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya. Only good things can come of this!

A war with North Korea is economically viable as it would be one of the shortest wars in history.

Indeed. Wars in Asia are known for their brevity.

In fact it would actually be a good thing in the long-run as once Korea is re-united it would mean the same number of allies for America, but one that is bigger and more profitable.

Exactly. I mean, North Korea and South Korea are like two peas in a pod. They have so much in common economically and culturally, that it makes perfect sense to jam them into a single country based on racial heritage. That has proven to be a smashing success all through Africa and the Middle East.

Trying to force impoverished countries into unions with wealthy countries is one of the hallmarks of the EU. Ever since the former bloc countries were brought in, things have been so stable and the EU seems to have a brighter future than ever!