Advertisement

FWD: US Supreme Court: Video Games protected by 1st Amendment

Started by July 25, 2011 10:54 AM
3 comments, last by ChurchSkiz 13 years, 3 months ago
URL : Link to Article




.....

Well. Now it is time to learn some more digital engineering and apply it to something for personal enrichment. I joke to myself as it may take several years just to get a GUI popup window to work right.

General Studies A.S - College of Southern Nevada 2003 GPA 2.3
I'm really surprised Roberts was one of the 2 against the decision. I thought this was a pretty cut and dry case. Reading the dissenting opinion didn't alleviate my concerns. They voted against it because, "Video games MIGHT not be the same as reading books." WTF......
Advertisement
I guess the Chief Justice doesn't play video games....?

Beginner in Game Development?  Read here. And read here.

 


They voted against it because, "Video games MIGHT not be the same as reading books."


Well this changes my outlook on everything. Putting out a call to protest art museums as we speak.

I guess the Chief Justice doesn't play video games....?


Roberts and Thomas (who voted with the majority) are the epitome of a justice to me. They vote in decisions that aren't popular or their own belief to uphold the constitution or decisions of past cases. Very odd that he chose to be against first amendment rights in this example especially when it was a 7-1 when it got to his vote.

This topic is closed to new replies.

Advertisement