That's fair enough, but your lack of knowledge and posturing as some kind of knowledgeable person is very insulting, and actually hurts people.
...
you're a liar who will repeatedly change his story and say anything to cover his own ass.
That's ironic too, and false. Despite your most aggressive efforts you have not managed to debunk my original statement that scientists have not been able to unify the 4 forces or my later statement that superstring theory is a dubious candidate to do so.
I may have been mistaken on two particulars of a dubious, quickly changing, unfinished, and unproven theory, which isn't even certain of its own fundamental particulars, and which I have not done more than skim the surface of (because it doesn't particularly attract my attention), but you have shown yourself to be a self admitted crackpot whose whole approach to science is actually based on ignorance, posturing, and insulting people and trying to damage their reputation.
In this disucssion you have been analogous to a baffling, pie throwing clown with poor eyesight and slow reflexes. And ironically, again, you have harmed/pie-d no one but yourself.
In fact I take, back my previous evaluation of your scientific ability and rate you down on that for the reasons above mentioned. You have no idea about proper science, and I doubt you ever been in a proper laboratory.
Further what you call "lying" and "changing his story and say anything to cover his own ass" highlights how dellusional you are. Your habit of pouncing on every word uttered in casual science conversation as if it were a legal document or an inflamatory article about child abuse tends to force that. And yes, I "change my story" if I'm mistaken about something as everyone adopting a scientific attitude should do. That does not make me a liar, in fact quite the opposite.
BTW, weren't you supposed to be leaving gamedev because you didn't like it here? Sincerely, I think that would be a good idea.