what C++ IDE & OS do you use
@hodgman : is it a really old one(I guess so XD)? I used some of the visual c++ epress edition, but you know, they're kinda resource hungry(dunno bout vs2008 upward though)
@zer0w0lf : I mean it, no joking
@hodgman : is it a really old one(I guess so XD)? I used some of the visual c++ epress edition, but you know, they're kinda resource hungry(dunno bout vs2008 upward though)
In that case, you are better off using Code::Blocks as your IDE, and telling it to use the VC++2010 Express compiler. The 2005 IDE was too much for my machine back when I had only 512mb, so I know what it's like.
it needs atleast a 1GB of ram and 1.6ghz processor
Never say Never, Because Never comes too soon. - ryan20fun
Disclaimer: Each post of mine is intended as an attempt of helping and/or bringing some meaningfull insight to the topic at hand. Due to my nature, my good intentions will not always be plainly visible. I apologise in advance and assure you I mean no harm and do not intend to insult anyone.
Anyway, I'll stick to my oldie until I find the need to move on...
VC++ 6.0 was heavily broken and out of date when it was NEW, an that was 13 years ago!
@Daark. I downloaded it. Now onto the hassle of setting things up correctly d(T.T)b
Anyway, I'll stick to my oldie until I find the need to move on...
MS used the bullshit excuse that it was a 'Windows Compiler' to try and hand wave away all it's faults. It didn't do many things properly, I can't remember if it came with a very broken implementation of the STL, or none at all?
You are only shooting yourself in the foot by using it. Use the new Visual C++ 2010 compiler with a different IDE, or use MingW (GCC for Windows).
MS used the bullshit excuse that it was a 'Windows Compiler' to try and hand wave away all it's faults. It didn't do many things properly, I can't remember if it came with a very broken implementation of the STL, or none at all?
It came with an incomplete, nonconforming variant of the C++ standard library, and no C++ compiler. Oh, it had a compiler it called C++, but it would not accept a lot of valid C++ source and the source it accepted was not C++. It was bizarre, considering the C++ standard was proclaimed prior to MSVC6 being released and Microsoft was a major contributor to the language standard. It was almost as if they were trying to be sneaky and trying to control the software development market through a twisted embrace-and-extend strategy, but the reality is far more mundane and consists of a lot of contract lawyers and lawsuits. I believe only the lawyers were successful.
Stephen M. Webb
Professional Free Software Developer
fixes:
fixed a bug that caused voters to select from the first IDE list
added Linux derivative to the OS list
moved CPPIDE to the second IDE list
---edit---
fixed a English to English translation bug(in this Document)
Never say Never, Because Never comes too soon. - ryan20fun
Disclaimer: Each post of mine is intended as an attempt of helping and/or bringing some meaningfull insight to the topic at hand. Due to my nature, my good intentions will not always be plainly visible. I apologise in advance and assure you I mean no harm and do not intend to insult anyone.
@Daark. I downloaded it. Now onto the hassle of setting things up correctly d(T.T)b
Anyway, I'll stick to my oldie until I find the need to move on...
Download the latest Microsoft compiler with the following download manager - Win SDK
Download the latest GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) for Windows here - TDM-GCC
Download Code:Blocks here - Code:Blocks. Don't download the MinGW one, as it includes an outdated version of GCC.
If you install the compilers to your machine before installing Code:Blocks, then the IDE should automatically detect them. Use Settings -> Compiler to pick which one you want to use