OK, stalker boy... nice segue LOL. Don't talk down to me and I won't show you up. It doesn't matter that you've been studying AI for longer than I have. I'm obviously as knowledgeable as you in the subject, if not more so.
Keeping a database of the evolving state of each "atom of space" in your Universe is not an act of intelligence. It's an act of bookkeeping. Your nonsensical chattering about causal horizons is superfluous.
No, what I'm talking about is real intelligence, like creating a whole new field of mathematics or something like that. Let's just assume that there is a finite number of laws defining this Universe, and so there is a limit to our intelligence. As well, history is only so rich. Most of history is highly compressable nothingness (e.g., "you are not a beautiful and unique snowflake").
Nice strawman, fuckface. Good bye.
The boundary between real and artificial intelligence
224
September 15, 2010 04:24 PM
Considering that after centuries philosophers don't have agreement on a clear definition of intelligence, it is mightily arrogant of you to claim you have one. I hate to break it to you, but your definition is no better than any of the others out there.
"But who prays for Satan? Who, in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most?" --Mark Twain
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Looking for a high-performance, easy to use, and lightweight math library? http://www.cmldev.net/ (note: I'm not associated with that project; just a user)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Looking for a high-performance, easy to use, and lightweight math library? http://www.cmldev.net/ (note: I'm not associated with that project; just a user)
This topic is closed to new replies.
Advertisement
Popular Topics
Advertisement
