Is it recommended to submit sample code for an entry level position, if it is not explicitly requested? If so, what are they looking for in sample code? I am guessing it should be in the language I'd be expected to work in, and solve an interesting or difficult problem. But how long should it be? Would the source code to a simple falling-block game be sufficient, or should I be focusing on solving some complex problem? The only game-related complex problem I've really worked hard on is a fluid dynamics system. Would I just show them the source, and does it have to compile? It would require a lot of extra unrelated fluff to get it to run. Should I just zip up a big Visual Studio project and let them poke around? Edit: WOW I spelled "applying" wrong in the title. -50 points.[Edited by - Swarmer on July 15, 2009 1:24:57 AM]

Quote:

Original post by Swarmer what are they looking for in sample code?

They're looking to see what problem-solving techniques you use. They're looking to see if you write clear comments, to see if somebody else could work with your code if necessary. They want to see that you use good standard structuring, best most elegant ways of doing things.
Nobody wants to see sloppy code, silly function names, uncommented code.

Sounds reasonable enough. Any specifics on the format? Snippets or a full project? I think I could communicate those objectives that you mentioned with some large code snippets, but would compilable code be desirable? My thinking is that most people aren't going to spend the time trying to compile everything. A working executable alongside the snippet should suffice, right?

I saw one company that wanted "a couple" of pieces of sample code, "a few thousand lines each". Is that really a common thing, or would a few hundred lines be sufficient?

Also, Tom, it's kind of interesting/intimidating talking to you about job applications, since Naked Sky is on my list of places to apply for :O
I mean the job listing gives "preference to applicants with 3+ years in the industry", but it's not unreasonable for a (to-be) graduate (at the end of 2009) to apply, is it?