Solid webhost provider? .NET
I need a server that can host .NET. The server must support url rewriting. I had a free test server that did NOT apply the .NET extension to all URLs. I couldnt rewrite urls like this unless it ended with .asp(x) (which is bad for images...) ex url: mysite.com/something/else/will work/with spaces
Also i need a host that will let me launch process like ffmpeg and imagemagik.
its a bonus if i can use PHP on it. Extreme bonus if i can use it as a SVN server but thats not required and may not be as useful as i think.
My budget is 15/mo but i much rather to have a server thats not more then 12/mo.
http://CodeSnippIt.com
15 what a month, Dollars? Pounds? Simoleans?
What you're asking for is not just a plain old web server, so I would suggest that you're not going to find somewhere for only £$S15/month.
I run my own hosting company, contact me if you want more information for what we can provide.
Many thanks,
What you're asking for is not just a plain old web server, so I would suggest that you're not going to find somewhere for only £$S15/month.
I run my own hosting company, contact me if you want more information for what we can provide.
Many thanks,
$15 USD
I'll PM you details.
I am still looking around. Really guys all i need is .NET (2.0 is good, 3.5 is preferred) and to be able to upload apps like imagemagik and ffmpeg and run them via shell. I need a db and able to (create and) write files but i assume they are both standard nowadays.
I'll PM you details.
I am still looking around. Really guys all i need is .NET (2.0 is good, 3.5 is preferred) and to be able to upload apps like imagemagik and ffmpeg and run them via shell. I need a db and able to (create and) write files but i assume they are both standard nowadays.
http://CodeSnippIt.com
Quote: Original post by Lendichado_
$15 USD
I'll PM you details.
I am still looking around. Really guys all i need is .NET (2.0 is good, 3.5 is preferred) and to be able to upload apps like imagemagik and ffmpeg and run them via shell. I need a db and able to (create and) write files but i assume they are both standard nowadays.
Those features aren't "all"; that's a lot.
The cheap hosting plans run tons of websites on a single computer, so they dedicate almost no CPU or other resources to any single website. Unless you only rarely run ffmpeg and the like, you'll probably use too much CPU power for a cheap plan.
Personally, I'll recommend a Virtual Private Server (VPS). They're practically as cheap as shared hosting plans these days, but you have full control of the system, so you get to install the software you wish to run.
Personally, I use VPS Land. They're very good, I've never had much downtime (probably only once or twice in 3 to 6 months) and their support team is very helpful and responsive.
Personally, I use VPS Land. They're very good, I've never had much downtime (probably only once or twice in 3 to 6 months) and their support team is very helpful and responsive.
I haven't used one myself, but you might look at Amazon's EC2 servers.(wikipedia article) From what I understand, its a rent-by the hour virtual machine system.
This topic is closed to new replies.
Advertisement
Popular Topics
Advertisement