Why are TARGA's more useful than .JPG/BMP?
May 29, 2004 11:05 AM
Smaller size? Speedier somehow? Is it REALLY necessary to implement a TARGA loading function? Thanks.
My fellow Americans I have just signed legislation that outlaws Russia forever. Bombing will commence in five minutes.
640
May 29, 2004 11:43 AM
bmps are huge compared to jpg''s/targa
Quote:
Original post by BosskIn Soviet Russia, you STFU WITH THOSE LAME JOKES!
122
May 29, 2004 11:45 AM
It''s also pretty easy to load ''cause the file format is very simple, even when it''s a compressed TGA
1,162
May 29, 2004 11:53 AM
.bmp - big; .jpeg - ugly picture (its compression looses data). Targa - comprimable, alpha channel, nice picture, easy loading =)
Oxyd
Oxyd
May 29, 2004 12:45 PM
Is there a good targa exporter that''s not photoshop, because I won''t be able to buy that for a few months.
My fellow Americans I have just signed legislation that outlaws Russia forever. Bombing will commence in five minutes.
May 29, 2004 01:42 PM
After converting my images to TARGA, I noticed that NeHe's TGA loader doesn't support grayscale images. Any thoughts on how to get around it? (I would just change my picture to color in GIMP but I'll be danged if I know how)
Oops disregard this post.
[edited by - uber_n00b on May 29, 2004 2:43:47 PM]
Oops disregard this post.
[edited by - uber_n00b on May 29, 2004 2:43:47 PM]
My fellow Americans I have just signed legislation that outlaws Russia forever. Bombing will commence in five minutes.
This topic is closed to new replies.
Advertisement
Popular Topics
Advertisement