Wow. I just installed Mandrake 9.2 and so far, am really impressed. Seems to be much nicer and smoother setup than 9.1. I still have OpenBSD 3.4 on the first half of this hd, as well as XP on the secondary hd. OBSD is for development/server management, XP is for games and random hardware compatability, and I do believe that Mandrake will quickly become my most primary OS. Now, I decided to install this just t use it so that I could have a little more first hand feedback before putting it on a partition in my parents'' house. This is the first time I have installed Linux and liked things right out of the gate though; if it is this nice before tweaking, I envy what it will be like post tweaking. In fact, it beats XP as far as an out of the box config goes, impo. Anyone else using 9.2?

I use Red Hat Linux right now, but am thinking about swithcing to Mandrake in the near future. I have a notebook running 5.1 in black and white console, and am impressed with even that! I have been meaning to get 9.2 for some of the computers in my house, just haven''t ordered it.

Scott Simontis
e-mail:ageofscott@comcast.net
AIM:ssimontis

I think mandrake is much better organized than fedora. In terms of the menu and stuff.

Although, did they ever fix the network on mandrake? I couldn''t seem to get it to work on that, one of the reasons why I am using fedora.

...because I am thinking of switching to mandrake to try it out because I really liked 9.1 so if they fixed the few problems I had I will probably switch.

Anyone know how well of a transition that would be in everything still working when I get mandrake working?

Thanks