I agree with C-Junkie on page one of this thread. I recently Triple-booted my computer (WinXP, win98se, Redhat 9) with something similar. my config is 2 60gig drives, the master with 40gig NTFS (XP), 10gig FAT32 (98), 10gig ext3 (Redhat), 500meg swap and the entire second drive for backups, music, videos, etc that all the OSes share. It was a pain to do three, no doubt, but two is much easier I recomend a seperate, shared fat32 partition for swapping/sharing files between OSes. install windows first, making sure to leave space for the linux, swap, and shared fat32 partitions, and then do linux after windows is completely installed. My rig is working great this way.
Ravyne
Owner/Lead Programmer & Designer
NYN Interactive Entertainment
HTTP://www.NYNInteractive.cjb.net
Newbie question
And, this would give me the option to choose which OS to load when I booted the system, or would I need to do something more?
Your linux distribution will come with a bootloader.
---------------------------------------------------
laziness is the foundation of efficiency
retrospiral.net | llamas! | megatokyo | FreeBSD | gamedev.net | google
---------------------------------------------------
laziness is the foundation of efficiency
retrospiral.net | llamas! | megatokyo | FreeBSD | gamedev.net | google
laziness is the foundation of efficiency | www.AdrianWalker.info | Adventures in Game Production | @zer0wolf - Twitter
quote:No, you don''t need to do anything more. When you install Linux you install an application called a bootloader (every OS has one, but since Windows is usually installed alone very few people think about its bootloader; the fact that it treats other OSes as boot sector virii doesn''t help). The choices are LILO or GRUB: if you will not be altering your installation configuration - adding secondary or tertiary Linux kernels, for example (usually for testing or development purposes) - then LILO is sufficient. If you will be making such alterations, LILO is still sufficient but GRUB is easier to deal with (failure to run lilo after installing a new kernel causes the bootloader to fail to recognize it; with GRUB you simple edit a text file, /etc/grub.conf or so).
Original post by LessThanJoe
And, this would give me the option to choose which OS to load when I booted the system, or would I need to do something more?
Happy hacking!
Make boot disk for both OS''s, and then if there''s any difficulty, you''ll be able to fix it.
WinNT/2k/XP has a very obvious bootloader which can boot Linux or DOS etc... Win9x is dead, don''t even install it.
...
mplayer ripped the Win32 directShow dlls, so I find it hard to agree with that. There''s only one type of file that I haven''t been able to play on Linux, and that''s a dv-avi file (dv-raw is no problem on Linux, and a no-go on Win32).
And perhaps the biggest bonus, a DVD player for Linux is freely available (ogle).
xmms will play your mp3''s with a plug-in (have to install it on your own with RH).
WinNT/2k/XP has a very obvious bootloader which can boot Linux or DOS etc... Win9x is dead, don''t even install it.
...
quote:
Original post by Raduprv
I do not suggest partitioning the drive in two equal pieces.
Obviously, you will use one OS more than the other, so I suggest letting more space for the Windows partition, because you might want to put movies, etc. on it. And windows has a better movie support than Linux does.
mplayer ripped the Win32 directShow dlls, so I find it hard to agree with that. There''s only one type of file that I haven''t been able to play on Linux, and that''s a dv-avi file (dv-raw is no problem on Linux, and a no-go on Win32).
And perhaps the biggest bonus, a DVD player for Linux is freely available (ogle).
xmms will play your mp3''s with a plug-in (have to install it on your own with RH).
- The trade-off between price and quality does not exist in Japan. Rather, the idea that high quality brings on cost reduction is widely accepted.-- Tajima & Matsubara
quote:
Original post by Magmai Kai Holmlor
WinNT/2k/XP has a very obvious bootloader which can boot Linux or DOS etc... Win9x is dead, don''t even install it.
Last I checked,which was like yesterday, every program out there still suports Win9x. So I guess it would still be alive. One day it will die, but its not dead yet. There are many people happy with their current setup and have no desire to switch OS. Alot of these people are running older systems and would have to upgrade to the much higher specs of XP and dont want to do that. I know I will need a very compeling reason to spend the money on the upgrade when I run Linux wich is free to stay current with. 100$ or whatever is a lot to pay for something that eats more system power and makes my desktop look like a playground but does little else for me. As for staying OT it looks like we have failed to mention that Linux uses a swap partition and this guy will need to actualy need two sections just for linux. If running XP then 4 total sections will be needed not just three. Someone made quick referance to it but I didn''t see anyone mention it dirctly.
------------------------------------------------------------- neglected projects Lore and The KeepersRandom artwork
hmm... Win9x is dying... the newer DirectXs don''t support Win95 anymore. DirectX10 probably won''t support Win98 anymore.... etc.
---------------------------------------------------
laziness is the foundation of efficiency
retrospiral.net | llamas! | megatokyo | FreeBSD | gamedev.net | google
---------------------------------------------------
laziness is the foundation of efficiency
retrospiral.net | llamas! | megatokyo | FreeBSD | gamedev.net | google
laziness is the foundation of efficiency | www.AdrianWalker.info | Adventures in Game Production | @zer0wolf - Twitter
quote:Enough with the highly opinionated propaganda. Microsoft no longer actively supports most 9x OSes (token support for 98 exists because the userbase didn''t shift to XP as expected) and there will be no new products based on or tuned specifically for the 9x kernel, ergo, 9x is dead.
Original post by Goober King
Last I checked,which was like yesterday, every program out there still suports Win9x...
Some people still run MS-DOS, but that doesn''t make it any less a relic of a (thankfully) bygone era. And we have all heard the overpricing rhetoric before; it adds nothing to the discussion.
quote:It''s not necessary to mention, since the installations for each tool take care of that (ie, he doesn''t have to be particularly mindful of it nor does he have to manually create the necessary partitions). But it''s good to be comprehensive, so yeah, LessThanJoe, remember to leave space for your Linux swap partition: 300 - 500MB sounds good.
As for staying OT it looks like we have failed to mention that Linux uses a swap partition and this guy will need to actualy need two sections just for linux.
P.S. No more discussions of Windows'' priceworthiness or merit as an OS, okay? Focus, people!
one thing noted earlier, perhaps off topic, but what the hey.
isn''t playing DVDs with ogle technically illegal? I thought that as the makers of ogle hadn''t paid lots of money to get the DVD format, they reverse engineered it, making it illegal? perhaps I''m wrong.
isn''t playing DVDs with ogle technically illegal? I thought that as the makers of ogle hadn''t paid lots of money to get the DVD format, they reverse engineered it, making it illegal? perhaps I''m wrong.
This topic is closed to new replies.
Advertisement
Popular Topics
Advertisement
Recommended Tutorials
Advertisement