Advertisement

Dev-C++ under linux?

Started by July 04, 2002 02:48 AM
18 comments, last by Ziphnor 22 years, 6 months ago
Being pretty tired of M$ products in general(and non-standard compliancy in their C++ compiler im seriously considering going the linux way. But what kind of IDEs are available under linux? I tried KDevelop at one time, and didnt really like it. I once tried Dev-C++ under windows, and i found it very functional, and i was under the impression that it was available for linux, but now i cant find it(apart from some over 1 year old sourceforge stuff about)... So does Dev-C++ for linux exist, and where can get it? And if not, are there any worthy competitors apart from KDevelop?
quote:
Original post by Ziphnor
So does Dev-C++ for linux exist, and where can get it?


It seems so: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=10639
quote:
Original post by Ziphnor
And if not, are there any worthy competitors apart from KDevelop?

Anjuta.

If you''re ever bored, try working without an IDE (i.e with a terminal or two, and your favorite text editor), you may just like it.

Advertisement
But the dates for the Dev-C++ for linux is one year back!
Perhaps its just dead in the water....

Anyway, that Anjuta IDE looks pretty good, when i get my new harddrive and install linux ill give it a try..

Thanks for helping out.
quote:
Original post by Ziphnor
But the dates for the Dev-C++ for linux is one year back!
Perhaps its just dead in the water....

Yes, perhaps (I didn''t bother to check the date, although I should have given what you''d said). Anjuta is better anyway .

Just tested out Anjuta on my laptop(it has little linux partition), seems to be a pretty good IDE, weird default color scheme though

The smart thing about Dev-C++ would have been that it existed on both windows and linux, which can be beneficial if you suddenly have to continue working on your project on another platform.
vi/emacs/pico ... and make

Documents [ GDNet | MSDN | STL | OpenGL | Formats | RTFM | Asking Smart Questions ]
C++ Stuff [ MinGW | Loki | SDL | Boost. | STLport | FLTK | ACCU Recommended Books ]
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." — Brian W. Kernighan
Advertisement
Dev-C++ on linux is dead.
Dev-C++ on linux
Hitchhiker90"There's one bitch in the world, one bitch with many faces" -- Jay"What are you people, on dope?" -- Mr. Hand
quote:
Original post by Fruny
vi/emacs/pico ... and make

Documents [ GDNet | MSDN | STL | OpenGL | Formats | RTFM | Asking Smart Questions ]
C++ Stuff [ MinGW | Loki | SDL | Boost. | STLport | FLTK | ACCU Recommended Books ]



Exactly!
I find XEmacs (www.xemacs.org) and mingw32 (www.mingw.org) to be more than enoght for using the same tools on different OS.


Just had a look at some XEmacs screenshots, and wow, that is one *ugly* program! Personally i prefer programs thats makes it easier to view the text, not harder
Also things like the collapsing funtion definitions(in Anjuta) seem very useful, especially when writing graphics code which tends to take up alot of space, and easily makes things impossible to work with.

Perhaps i should be more precise, im looking for an IDE somewhat like Visual Studio, things like collapsing funtion definitions(even if i still cant get it work in VS with C++, works in Anjuta though) and the whole intellisense thing can be incredibly helpful. Also, not having to mess with make files is also a great help (but perhaps i should try it, just so i can say i know how its done....)

quote:
Original post by Ziphnor
Just had a look at some XEmacs screenshots, and wow, that is one *ugly* program! Personally i prefer programs thats makes it easier to view the text, not harder

It may not be easy to view the text, but it''s certainly easy to change the text in just about any way (once you learn how). After all, the Emacs philosophy is to ''do everything'' . I never really got used to Emacs for writing code (although I do use it for some things), so I just use NEdit.

This topic is closed to new replies.

Advertisement